01/09/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• 3. Table the application and request more information. • RECOMMENDATION The subject site is unique and holds numerous physical development constraints. As currently proposed, it is the opinion of staff that the intent of the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) has not been satisfied. Rather, it appears the PDO has been requested as a means to circumvent many requirements of the ordinance without resulting in a superior development product. As a result, staff recommends denial of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning and preliminary plat. Should, however, the Planning and Zoning Board choose to approve the request, staff recommends that the following conditions be satisfied: 1. The Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning must be in effect before the preliminary plat/PDO plan approval is in effect. 2. The proposed bridge, street, and utilities are established as a private roadway the maintenance of which shall not be the responsibility of the City. 3. The submitted plans be revised such that individual lots are extended through the private street with an easement established over such street (to allow cross access). 4. A cul -de -sac is created at the terminus of the existing public street segment to allow for vehicular turnaround maneuvers (including those of City snowplows). 5. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard to street construction requirements. 6. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation regarding the acceptability of the bridge and its wetland impacts. 7. On- street parking (along the private street) be prohibited. 8. In exchange for setback flexibility, the following be provided: A. A detailed tree preservation plan including: 1. An inventory of significant trees 2. A description of tree preservation efforts that would be implemented during both mass and custom grading 3. Specific parameters for tree preservation for custom graded lots including the percentages of significant trees to be saved 10