My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/13/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/13/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 1:25:46 PM
Creation date
6/4/2014 12:56:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/13/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 9, 2002 <br />Page 7 <br />report had been included in the agenda packet for the May 27, 1997 City Council <br />meeting. <br />Chair Schaps stated it would be very unusual for a right -of -way dedication to not extend <br />to the end of a parcel since the intent of the right -of -way was to allow the future extension <br />of and connection to a roadway. <br />Pastor Gilbertson questioned why the Church would be responsible for the extension of <br />the roadway. Chair Schaps stated in the event the property owner wished to develop the <br />land, part of that agreement would be the extension of the roadway. <br />Pastor Gilbertson indicated the Church has no future development plans at this point. <br />Chair Schaps indicated this was the reason the City has a transportation plan in order to <br />plan for future development that may or may not be anticipated at this time. <br />Pastor Gilbertson believed the Church would be willing to provide the necessary right -of- <br />way dedication. However, he reiterated that when the Subdivision had originally <br />been approved the right -of -way expectations had bee s unclear. <br />Ms. Gretz noted at this time the City was only <br />way, not the payment of any assessments. <br />r the dication of the right -of- <br />Chair Schaps confirmed it was the consens • � s and that, along with the right -of- <br />way dedication, the intent would be • reco ens '-approval of the construction of the <br />picnic shelter, conditioned on th . shelt being reduced slightly in size and the tool <br />shed being attached to the garage, e total square- footage of the structures <br />meets the requirements of <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOTI o cl e the public hearing at 7:05 p.m., and was supported <br />by Mr. Lyden. Motion carrie <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Gethsemane United Methodist <br />Church Conditional Use Permit Amendment for the construction of a picnic shelter, <br />subject to the following conditions: <br />1. A building permit must be obtained for construction of the proposed picnic <br />shelter. <br />2. Issuance of the building permit will not be granted until the former approved <br />dedication of the Stage Coach Trail right -of -way is officially recorded. Such <br />dedication is with the understanding that Parcels B and C will be financially <br />responsible for the future construction of the street, as approved by City Council <br />on May 27, 1997. <br />3. The tool shed and garage structures shall be combined, or the tool shed <br />eliminated, so that the total square- footage of the accessory strucurs on site do not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.