My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/13/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
03/13/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 3:14:01 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 9:41:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/13/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 9, 2002 <br />Page 23 <br />Gwen Pederson stated one reason she opposed the development was due to safety <br />concerns for the neighborhood children. She indicated that all the residents in her <br />neighborhood use the streets and she was concerned about the additional traffic. <br />Ms. Pederson stated at one point the subject property had been included in the City's <br />Comprehensive Park Plan and she questioned what happened to those plans. She stated <br />when she bought her home she had been informed that a natural trail would be created <br />from the development to the island. She felt the island would be a great place for a <br />natural park and she questioned the credibility of the City Council when the plans for a <br />park are thrown out in favor of development. <br />Kari Bormhoft, Lot #7 Quail Ridge, stated she felt very strongly about the safety of her <br />neighborhood. She stated she has two small children and because her neighborhood has <br />no connections to parks or trails, her children play in the street : n • s. She stated she <br />supported the other comments made this evening in oppositi•f the p•posed <br />development. <br />Margy Cory stated her lot is adjacent to the proposehorn, andv e was not pleased by <br />the proposed development. She indicated when • uai Ridg .'`d been built there had <br />been concerns for the soil conditions and the ,• €�x • ty he questioned who will be <br />responsible for the repair of the existing r•,. if the " nstruction vehicles cause <br />damage. <br />Ms. Cory stated she had attended vi + tal Board meeting when the proposed <br />development had been recom ial. She stated the Environmental Board had <br />expressed concern regardi y - a m ng trees and wildlife. She stated she has seen many <br />deer, raccoons, possums . _ es o e subject property and she was concerned how <br />the development will " %,r + . Additionally, she has found Indian artifacts such as <br />arrow heads in the <br />Ms. Cory state - n she rchased her home she had been required to purchase flood <br />insurance and n> of is much higher than the subject lot. <br />Ms. Cory stated her neighborhood has weekly trash pickups and daily mail and other <br />deliveries. She expressed concern for how these types of services will be handled with <br />the private road and whether one large dumpster will be placed at the entrance to the <br />development. For these and other reasons, she did not support the proposed development. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:38 p.m., and was supported <br />by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />Mr. Smyser noted a letter had been received from Theodore and Cheryl Brausen, 6763 <br />Timberwolf Trail, expressing support for the proposed development, which would be <br />entered into the record. <br />Chair Schaps asked if neighborhood meetings had been held regarding this development. <br />Mr. Smyser did not believe any neighborhood meetings had been held. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.