My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/13/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
03/13/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 3:14:01 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 9:41:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/13/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 9, 2002 <br />Page 30 <br />for discussion. The Planning and Zoning Board will hold a public hearing. Then it will <br />go to the City Council for a first and second reading. Staff stated the Board is asked to <br />elect two Planning and Zoning Board members to serve on the Development Regulations <br />Task Force. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked how long the task force meetings would last. Mr. Smyser anticipated <br />that the meetings would last as long as it takes to get the necessary work done. <br />Mr. Smyser indicated Mr. Grochala was in attendance at this time to address this issue. <br />He stated Mr. Grochala attended this evening's City Council work session during which <br />this task force had been discussed. <br />Mr. Grochala stated during the City Council work session earlier this evening the Council <br />discussed the schedule and the bylaws of the Development Re Task Force. The <br />Council anticipated the task force would meet once per mon 9 • the t d or fourth <br />Thursday and first meeting was scheduled for Thursday, : • . 2002. <br />Mr. Grochala indicted the City Council strongly su essive schedule in <br />order to complete the work within the schedule • time rame „ e indicated if it appeared <br />the work would not be completed within the s • ime frame, then additional <br />meetings may be added so the deadline is <br />Mr. Lyden asked that he be removed frog consid`F` ation as a member of the task force <br />since he did not believe the new + eh a v lan will be able to meet some of its <br />significant goals. Chair Schap sp •"is request. <br />Mr. Lyden made a MOT <br />Development Regula <br />lect s. Lane and Mr. Hyden to serve on the <br />Force. <br />Ms. Lane nominated Schaps and Mr. Lyden nominated Mr. Rafferty to serve on the <br />task force. <br />Mr. Rafferty statl he would support any member of the Board being elected to the task <br />force. He felt thahair Schaps would be an excellent choice to serve on the task force <br />due to his experience. He stated he would like to hear the opinions of Ms. Lane and Mr. <br />Hyden on serving on the task force. <br />Ms. Lane stated in the early 1980's she had served on a task force, which dealt with <br />ordinances. She stated she had the time available and would be willing to serve on the <br />Development Regulations Task Force. <br />Mr. Hyden indicated he was willing to serve on the task force but expressed concern for <br />the fact that he was new to the Planning and Zoning Board. He felt he has a great deal to <br />learn but acknowledged serving on the task force may be one way to be educated. He <br />stated he too would prefer that Chair Schaps serve on the task force. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.