My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/08/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
05/08/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 3:38:34 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 12:04:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
05/08/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 10, 2002 <br />Page 16 <br />replacing more than they were required to replace. He stated they were meeting the Rice <br />Creek Watershed rules regarding this. <br />Mr. Hyden asked what was the penalty if future residents impacted the wetlands. Mr. <br />Weiland stated this would be up to the City and their rules. <br />Mr. Hyden asked who was overseeing that the future residents would not impact the <br />wetlands. Mr. Weiland stated as the developer they were required to monitor the <br />wetlands they created, but beyond that, it was under City's control and monitoring. He <br />stated the monitoring they were talking about was the wetlands they created to make sure <br />they got established. <br />Mr. Corson asked if they could extend their utilities <br />Krystofiak stated they could cross over it, butt e' <br />to be followed and they would work closely <br />e St. Paul Waterline. Brian <br />guidelines that would need <br />Mr. Grochala replied with respect to tabling it wa <br />comments on the Comprehensive Plan, but this <br />and they would continue to work with the developer an <br />any remaining issues. <br />ed to w he Met Council's <br />meet the Plan as it stood today <br />nts to attempt to work out <br />Mr. Corson requested another notice b Is once this item was brought <br />back. <br />Chair Schaps asked if further commentsTd be made even though the public <br />hearing had been closed. Mr. S' y - • lied they could reopen the public hearing upon <br />notice. <br />Ms. Lane ma <br />Preliminary:, <br />staff's report <br />Board's agenda. <br />OTION <br />to obi <br />staff directs t <br />Stoneybrook's MUSA Allocation, Rezoning, and <br />dditional information and modifications as noted in <br />em should be placed on the Planning and Zoning <br />The motion was support' . Corson. <br />Motion carried 5 -0. <br />Mr. Zych left the meeting at 8:55 p.m. <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />Ms. Lane asked how the Ordinance Task Force was coming along. Chair Schaps replied <br />they were having meetings and they were almost on track. He stated the meetings were <br />going well and he believed they would be caught up in two weeks. <br />Mr. Corson asked what the City did if a resident impacted the wetland. He stated he <br />would like to discuss this at a future meeting. Mr. Grochala replied all of the wetlands <br />were dedicated as easements and they had to stay as they were. Filling in wetlands was a <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.