05/08/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 2002 Page 8 District (RCWD) Land Development Permit was also required. The house pad on Lot 9, Block 9 should be reoriented to provide a more suitable building pad. The plan does not identify the Normal or High Water Level for wetlands No. 12 and No. 13. Staff noted mitigation sites were proposed to be fenced off after grading was completed to restrict construction traffic. According to the plans, there were no provisions for bringing materials onto the site or hauling off the site. With respect to utilities, staff stated a preliminary plan had been submitted and was subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Sanitary Sewer was proposed to be expected to the site from its existing location in Sherman Lake Road, north of Birch Street. Water would be provided by connection to the existing 16" trunk water main lying adjacent to the property on the south side of Bit proposed to be looped back to the system by cr Staff indicated adequate capacity exists . n the proposed development. In addition, the B aI Fly' Lii�i M hich served the area, was scheduled for replacement in 2003. t. The water main was treet at Pheasant Hills sewer system to service Staff stated with respect to drainage and util. in width at adjoining lot lines, and 10 fee lines as required. Drainage and Utility Level and those covering underground by the City Engineer. Easements :ffic= az1 areas. Specifically, easements sh emergency overflow on Lots With respect to P subdivision at i payment in lie February 5 limits of the �fp several alternativ aseme re being proposed five feet adjoining street lines and rear lot ng the 100 year High Water subject to review and approval access all pond and wetland ccess Outlot F and cover the stated the Park Board discussed the proposed The Board was recommending 100% cash . As explained in the Public Services Director's ftparkland memorandum';; pensive Par roposed development lies outside the planning d Trial System Plan. The Park Board looked at ed the payment in lieu as the preferred option. Regarding floodplain, s' "`:tea d portions of the site lies within the Floor Plain Zone A. Zone A represented areas o 00 -year floor where based floor elevations had not been determined. The City's Floodplain Management Ordinance required that principal structures be located no lower than one foot above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The City's subdivision Ordinance required that proposed basements be four (4) feet above the water table (normal water level) and two (2) feet above the design flood levels of ponding areas. Staff stated the submitted grading plan identified proposed 100 feet High Water Level elevations. Conformance to the requirements could not be determined for Lots 23 and 27, Block 8 due to lack of documentation on the normal and high water levels of wetlands No. 12 and No. 13. The applicant should submit this documentation. All other lots were in conformance. DRAFT MINUTES