My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/28/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
02/28/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2016 4:30:08 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:21:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
02/28/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 2001 <br />Wessel noted there were two more meetings on the Comprehensive Plan before the end of <br />March. <br />Donlin asked what the meeting scheduled for Saturday was dealing with. Wessel <br />responded the meeting would address the Comprehensive Plan in the City Council <br />meeting. <br />B. Concept Review: Highland Meadows 3rd Addition/concept plan/ James R. Hill, Inc. <br />— Asleson read from the project tracking sheet noting that this was a sketch plan not a <br />formal application. The only significant vegetation was classified as oak savanna in the <br />West Central area of the plot. There were no planned greenways in the area. The land <br />was ideal for keeping the water on the site, and the water leaving the site flows into <br />Marshan Lake. Staff is urging a tree preservation plan, as well as preserving the oak <br />woodland. The standard recommendations applied. He asked for comments. <br />Grundhofer asked if there were buildings already present. <br />Chair Lanyon inquired about the issue of greenways. <br />Asleson stated it would be a standard subdivision or conservati'ot rdevelop 'ent. He <br />introduced Steve Schmidt the developer of the site. <br />Mr. Schmidt mentioned that he was also the developer ofthe'"piece of'land to the South. <br />The trees were inventoried. The pines six to eight feet tall wouldb'e relocated to screen <br />Highway 242, however instead of using the six{o eiglifeet tall}'trees, they would replace <br />them with 15 foot pines before grading. The`fidesignhconiguration attempted to work <br />around the trees. ` � 'w::4 . ; t <br />. 1I <br />Donlin stated that the pines were not as`,importai4 as the oak savanna area. She asked <br />where on the plat did they lie Mr,y.Schmtidt ans'ered in the mid -western area. In the <br />southern part of the oak saysia, sanie of the trees would be lost. <br />Chair Lanyon urged Mr 'rSchmidt to aye as many oaks and native vegetation as possible. <br />Mr. Schmidt responydecpther adjacent developed areas dictate some of the roads. <br />Donlin advised',an atteinpt sh9uld be made to avoid the "cookie cutter" approach. She <br />noted that imporfalt considerations were viewscapes, open space planning, the woods <br />should be,,,,preserved and the houses should be in pockets. <br />Trehus inquired oMr. Schmidt, did anyone come to him asking for the R-1 type of <br />housing. Mr. Schmidt indicated planning staff wanted 10-8 minimum lots, not smaller. <br />Kukonen assured Mr. Schmidt that the critique of old development practices were not <br />aimed at him, but that the goal was 50% conservation development. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.