My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/25/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
04/25/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 12:07:22 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:24:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
04/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 25, 2001 <br />Donlin expressed concern over a 500 year event, and wanted to know where the water <br />would go in those instances. She noted there had been three such events in 10 days in <br />1992. Mr. Payton indicated a 100 year event of 5.9 inches would discharge over a 48 <br />hour period. Emergency overflow would move toward Highway 35W, the flow direction <br />would not change. <br />Trehus indicated the water would eventually flow into George. Watch Lake, and in an <br />event over two inches would move too quickly. Mr. Payton explained he did not have the <br />numbers for the water volume. The total capacity of the pond was 9.9 acre ft. of storage, <br />however, all surfaces receive water. He explained the flow will either go over the land or <br />underground. <br />Trehus urged a reviewal of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet by the Board <br />before the City Council approved the project. Asleson noted the proposal was to be <br />submitted after the present meeting and it would receive approval before the next <br />meeting. <br />Wessel stated final approval was to come in July. <br />O'Connell inquired about the treatment of oils and gases in the Water. Mr aPayton <br />explained that because petroleum products float, there would be a'skimming feature. <br />The Board discussed lighting and signage. Kukoneninquired whether' Target would be <br />willing to use a non -backlit logo. Mr. Payton answered the sign,slould be visible to the <br />East and West where there were mainly businesses. i. Y' <br />Vice Chair Mach asked if all the stores liadgs niilar lighting and signage. Mr. Payton <br />responded the store plans accommodate the requirements of the planning and zoning in <br />each city. '� <br />E�sx �; <br />l'A <br />The issue of parking spaces ty,�as discussed iff relation to the ordinances and the <br />requirements of the stores. 'G {undki`ofer1noted the City requirements were exceeded by <br />103 spaces. <br />Mr. Payton addressed the<green space in relation to parking. He explained that questions <br />remain as to where the' green"space is distributed. If within the parking lot, they could <br />create visual barriers''causing accidents. If it were a block on the side, it would create an <br />unbroken pavement:;:; <br />Trehus urged Target/Ryan to reduce the number of spaces and explore green parking, <br />because ofthe potential degradation of George Watch Lake. Mr. Payton answered <br />rE. <br />impervious or green parking was difficult to maintain with shopping carts, and dirt mud <br />tracking in the stores. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.