My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/26/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
09/26/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 11:57:27 AM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
09/26/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 <br />PROJECT REVIEW <br />A. Appointment of New Chair — The Board discussed the positions of Chair and Vice <br />Chair. Trehus nominated Kukonen for Chair of the Board. O'Connell seconded the <br />motion. Motion carried unanimously. Grundhofer nominated Trehus for Vice Chair. <br />Kukonen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />B. Market Place Update — Grochala stated that due to the legislature lowering the required <br />votes to pass a motion, the Ryan/Target Market Place project is active again. There were <br />actions discussing subsidies and Lake Drive traffic issues, as w4as Wetland <br />Y .14ay* <br />replacement. <br />Grundhofer inquired about the wetland mitigation at the golf cORAe did.ihave a buffer <br />zone and would it be affected. Asleson indicated that he had.not-ccn.4anything, but <br />would obtain a copy of the plans and check on it. <br />,4 <br />0' Connell stated that at the present time there were& b , r <br />,k F <br />a <br />Grundhofer asked if a buffer was required. GrOi.a4arrepponded that it was in the <br />jurisdiction of the Rice Creek Watershed Distrfee''''" <br />Trehus inquired about the PDO, was it dila orTaur ivotes. Grochala answered that it was <br />three votes, and was reviewed and supottcd by steral government agencies. He <br />....4., <br />continued that the issues Asleson wo , tifoRyan/Target were based on the best <br />management practices practices and mainte concerning catch basins to reduce phosphorus <br />loading The The intention of the Citywas, put infiltration operation and maintenance best <br />practices in the agreement to ' ce impact. <br />Ito <br />Asleson mentioned the off si equi • <br />that the on site wouldfirer ease. <br />"iv r :.tre <br />n would reduce the phosphorus the same amount <br />Trehus questioned abatement for the project. Grochala responded that tax <br />abatement was linked: ih husiness subsidies of $519,000 from on site, while the <br />existing 1is ori thc site otal 522,000 annually. If the estimated 5 -year at $500,000 <br />would be cceeded thetilhota of time could be reduced for the tax abatement. <br />C. Raske Building !,Systems, Apollo Business Center, Minor Subdivision, Site Plan <br />Review — Asle,reviewed the background that the site was one of two buildable sites <br />left in the Apollo' Business District, and the area was zoned Light Industrial. The main <br />environmental issue had been surface water, however it was noted that an isolated <br />artificial pond was adequate to deal with the surface runoff from the two sites. One <br />concern was that a mixed hardwood stand in the west might be affected by the drainage <br />swails. He identified the options to recommend denial, or to recommend approval with <br />the standard staff and any added Board recommendations. The use of natural vegetation <br />in the drainage and swail areas with a transitional area including a possible flower <br />garden. A flower garden could also be added in the northwest corner. A change in the <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.