My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/26/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
09/26/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 11:57:27 AM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
09/26/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 <br />trees near the freeway to Oak species was recommended, or if pines were needed <br />Austrian Pine should be used with mulch to separate from the native plantings. A <br />contract to install the plantings with a company specializing in native landscape <br />construction needed to be submitted. A three-year maintenance agreement with a <br />landscape company specializing in native plantings needed to be submitted. Finally the <br />use of low impact lighting would be recommended. <br />Chair Kukonen inquired about the possibility of another proposed site between the two <br />sites. Grundhofer responded that the whole four acres would be developed. <br />Asleson suggested that the red cedars could be moved around bedMettliey were small. <br />Chair Kukonen indicated that the pond had sand on the open eriOnd theIiiwale was clean. <br />O'Connell questioned whether the six acres included thOr:She illmmended that a <br />tree inventory be submitted, because the road to the site iiicWdedNorthern Black <br />• <br />Cherries, ash, and several others. <br />Trehus posed the question of where the swails wereA*d and asked how much water <br />cavv-; <br />flowed through there. Asleson answered that tnethielm120% impervious, and there was <br />a need to increase the infiltration rates on *pprvious areas. <br />t <br />Chair Kukonen inquired if the plaimed 55, parkingq0aces were the maximum allowed, <br />and whether it could be reduced. Akte§on'tkOded that it could be reduced to the <br />minimum. A <br />Trehus asked if there was a i,sibiUtY.ofsunkdn islands in the middle of the parking lot. <br />Asleson explained that it coactbe rcomni ended if feasible. <br />,v,WItArts9 <br />Grundhofer clarified tljgj":e„;yv dikm e would be leased to another company with the <br />option to buy. She igRpliectiOetliate company produced or stored cleaning supplies. <br />Asleson indicated that: e company was a distributor. <br />Grundhofcr addresscdair: issue of spillage of any kind. Asleson pointed out that OSHA <br />and MPCAstandards regtilatcd chemical use and clean up, while the Department of <br />Agricu1turcioiilicked pesticide use. <br />Grundhofer addrcssed the recently developed hardwood trees, would the water impact the <br />trees. Asleson indicated that grading would remove the trees. <br />Chair Kukonen reviewed the recommendations to be attached to option 1. <br />• The use of low impact lighting focused down to the ground with no spill. <br />• Attempt to decrease the number of parking spaces to the minimum possible. <br />Grundhofer added another recommendation: <br />• A tree preservation plan should be submitted. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.