My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/28/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
11/28/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2016 5:06:06 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:32:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
11/28/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001 <br />but expressed concern over the possibility that the caps could be removed, and <br />safety issues surrounding that situation. <br />Trehus questioned if the tubes were perforated. Powell answered that they were. <br />He added that he was concerned about small children falling into them as can <br />occur with uncapped wells. There is no requirement for disclosure, but the buyer <br />needed to know if they were located on their property. <br />Donlin posed the question about who would be liable. Powell responded anyone <br />who had contact with the property including the Watershed Atrict, the developer, <br />the City Engineer and others. <br />Asleson added that there was a concern for toxins entering <br />Donlin stated that she thought it would be an eyesore-Ghi4 er agreed and <br />questioned if they were not much higher than groundlOv, **Meson stated that he <br />was not sure what the cap looked like. <br />1:$-• <br />Powell stated that there was usually four inchesof soil, and rocks around the <br />tube to keep it in place. <br />• <br />O'Connell inquired about the City no <br />indicated that he thought the City s o <br />for infiltration. <br />dents of its presence. Powell <br />ormation about the opportunity <br />Donlin expressed concern for theron colony and noted in the October 24 <br />meeting outline of the Sur, agement Plan had inconsistencies in the <br />deadline of January 31. ell ihdIiated that the differences between the <br />Watershed District's seco Ion plan needed to be reconciled with the <br />Surface Water Mana mentPJanby the end of January for the Metropolitan <br />„ <br />Council. <br />Trehus ipted that <br />the SuJJ, <br />eron colony was mentioned in the Rice Creek Plan, not <br />went Plan. <br />DonlinFait was too late to discuss concerns, maybe to make a paragraph <br />statement : , orward it to staff. Asleson responded that Wayne LeBlanc was <br />working to Oar;d: a joint ordinance between Lino Lakes and Centerville to limit <br />boating in the northern section of the island, because people were water skiing <br />there. <br />Trehus questioned what was to be discussed at the meeting next month. Powell <br />answered that he would address infiltration standards and pond analysis, but try to <br />avoid a long dialogue. The ordinances would be overhauled next year. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.