My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/10/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
07/10/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2014 4:11:08 PM
Creation date
6/6/2014 9:32:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/10/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 12, 2002 <br />Page 10 <br />Mr. Rieger asked how they would get utilities from Circle Pines. Ms. Gretz replied that <br />was under investigation. It might involve a Joint Powers Agreement between the two <br />cities. <br />Mr. Rieger replied everyone on Indian Hills Drive had underground utilities. He asked if <br />those services if extended would be underground also. Ms. Gretz replied she assumed <br />they would be underground. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. <br />The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. <br />Motion carried 4 -0. <br />Mr. Lyden inquired about the drainage. Ms. <br />the east to the retention ponds. <br />ite would be draining to <br />Mr. Lyden stated all of the run -off would go ea <br />it was her understanding that was where the flowage w <br />Mr. Lyden asked where the Rice Creek,1 s with this. Ms. Gretz replied all of <br />the paperwork had been completed, wit TWAPAA apkr val given. <br />the north. Ms. Gretz replied <br />Mr. Lyden asked about the fencing <br />put in because the Ordinance rep <br />neighbors wanted landscaping, <br />stated landscapin <br />rsus la sca. . Ms. Gretz stated the fencing was <br />d some screiiiiig. However, she stated if the <br />ould put landscaping in instead of fencing. She <br />uld work well for this site. <br />Mr. Lyden as a" out the 11 <br />downward would not be <br />lighting, the applicant could put <br />would be a problem, an t the <br />s. Gretz replied the lighting would be aimed <br />a lighting. She stated if there was a problem with <br />ders on the lights. She stated she did not think this <br />work it out. <br />Mr. Lyden inquired aboute traffic. Ms. Gretz replied this was a County Road. She <br />pointed out that this congregation was 180 people and they did not anticipate this would <br />increase traffic dramatically. She stated the Board could recommend a condition saying <br />that approval by Anoka County Highway Department was necessary before any <br />development was approved. She stated they would need to rely on Anoka County's <br />recommendation regarding traffic. <br />Mr. Corson inquired about the utilities. Ms. Gretz replied they were currently working <br />on the utility issue. She stated it was her understanding that if utilities were available, <br />they would urge applicant to hook up to those utilities. <br />Mr. Corson inquired about the parking lot entrance surface. Ms. Gretz replied the plans <br />showed a gravel driveway at the entrance, but she was not sure why. Mr. Corson <br />expressed concern about a gravel driveway. Ms. Gretz replied that might be one of the <br />conditions the Board wanted to add. She stated they could require a paved driveway. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.