07/10/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Page 2 Staff explained Emergency Apparatus Maintenance, located at 7512 -4th Avenue, is a company that repairs and customizes equipment used by fire departments. The current 5,600 sq. ft. building was approved in 1996 with plans which indicated an area for future expansion. The company would now like to expand into the area indicated in the 1996 plans, and has submitted an application for a Site Plan Review Staff presented its analysis by explaining the site was a 1.12 acre triangular piece of property located to the east of 4th Avenue within the Lino Industrial Park. Superior Masonry & Concrete abuts the site to the north, with Nol -Tec located to the south. Staff stated the existing building measured 5,273 sq.ft. The proposed addition would be located to the east of the current building and measure 5,450 sq.ft. The expanded area would be used exclusively as repair bays. Staff indicated the building elevations showed the proposed addition matched the existing building of color and materials, which was rock face concrete block. Staff stated the b li height was similar as well Staff reviewed the proposed setbacks for the With respect to parking, staff indicated a new 4th Avenue. Staff stated parking for the origin each employee (6), with nine stalls actually c; with proposed plans showing a total of 19: City Ordinance required light manufac employee or one space for each 2,000 f minimum of ten parking stalls wer each employee. access as proposed onto was calculated at one stall for tructed - actuall aee are now ten employees, constructed. Staff stated ,rovide "one space for each 5fxs:... ea, whichever is greater." A e site, calculating one stall for With respect to grading/draina preliminary Gradi remained incom from Mr. Studer drainage, arr to any Ci Co staff indicated the applicant had submitted a r r d Drainage plan, although some information gineer ` Studenski. The memo dated June 6, 2002 hala detailed these issues. Staff stated all grading, esolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to Micha << issues mus ieview. Staff indicated Rice rshed had issued a TWAFAA for the proposed project pending receipt of several dm nistrative items, including: 1.) Incorporation of infiltration practices. 2.) Existing versus proposed swale capacity narrative. 3.) Revegetation specifications for incorporated infiltration BMP's (best management practices). With respect to lighting, Staff indicated submitted plans showed wall pack style fixtures, which did not comply with City Ordinance lighting standards. The applicant had been directed to use shoebox style, no -spill fixtures which will deliver meter readings within City standards ( <1 foot candle on public streets). With respect to landscaping, Staff stated City Ordinance allowed impervious surface coverage up to 90% in a General Industrial Zone. No landscaping was proposed, and staff was not recommending any, as the addition was located behind the original structure and was surrounded by similar industrial uses. DRAFT MINUTES