My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/10/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
07/10/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2014 4:11:08 PM
Creation date
6/6/2014 9:32:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/10/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 12, 2002 <br />Page 3 <br />Staff indicated the trash dumpster servicing the original building was located in the area <br />planned for expansion and, as a result, would have to be moved to a new location. Staff <br />stated original plans approved a dumpster without an enclosure; instead four pine trees at <br />the rear of the lot were installed. Staff indicated since the pine trees were only <br />approximately three feet high and offered no real screening of an otherwise exposed <br />dumpster, and since the previous trash arrangements were made under a previous <br />Ordinance, staff would require that the dumpster be enclosed as required under Section 3, <br />subd. 4.G.2.c of the current ordinance. <br />Staff stated the building was required to be sprinkled. Review of the fire suppression <br />system would be handled as a building inspection issue. <br />In conclusion, staff indicated plans for the ori <br />identified an area to the east of the building to <br />application described a 5,450 -sq.ft addition to <br />repair bays. Staff would recommend approval <br />conditions: <br />Iding, approved in 1996, <br />expansion. The current <br />±fig, for use as <br />the following <br />on <br />licatioi <br />1.) Proper building permits be obtain -,, • •. any cr`tuction. <br />2.) The City Engineer shall review � '.pp aE. ,, ecessary grading, utility, and <br />drainage plans: incomplete gra•' :, ut ? . _ ainage issues identified in the <br />memo dated June 6, 2002 from 'ty aneim Studenski are to be resolved to <br />his satisfaction prior to any City Co -w. <br />3.) Permits be obtained by Rice Creek W: 'ershed prior to any site work or issuance <br />of building permits. <br />4.) Cut sheets <br />style, no <br />new choice of fixture <br />5.) Trashldpsters must b€ <br />plans '6 <br />hting 't ure choice meeting City Ordinance (shoebox <br />revised otometric lighting plan which reflects the <br />must be submitted prior to City Council review. <br />nclosed within a six -foot high fence or wall. Elevation <br />nclosure must be submitted prior to City Council review. <br />Staff recommended a <br />outlined. <br />e Site Plan Review application with the conditions as <br />Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. <br />Jeff Anderson, General Manager, stated they agreed with the conditions as outlined by <br />staff. <br />Chair Rafferty inquired about the number of stalls. Mr. Anderson replied the requirement <br />was 10 stalls and they were proposing installing 18 stalls. <br />Mr. Lyden asked why condition number 6 was omitted. Ms. Gretz replied she was not <br />sure if this condition would be taken off or not at this time, but this would be resolved by <br />the time it went to the Council. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.