My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/10/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
07/10/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2014 4:11:08 PM
Creation date
6/6/2014 9:32:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/10/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />CEPTED. Officer Mike Rumpsa prepared a review on January 21, 2002 (attached). He <br />expressed concern with the additional traffic load on Birch Street, particularly with <br />morning rush hour traffic. <br />Landscaping. A landscaping plan for screening along Birch Street has been submitted as <br />required. The plan consists of a combination of deciduous and coniferous trees. The <br />City's Environmental Specialist is recommending replacement of the proposed Colorado <br />Spruce with the White Spruce. <br />The developer is also proposing to add an additional coniferous tree buffer along the <br />northeasterly and westerly property lines in response to adjacent property owner <br />concerns. <br />Phasing. The applicant is proposing to phase the development over two years. 52 lots <br />are proposed for development in 2002. The remaining 50 lots would be developed in <br />2003. <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The proposed subdivision does not <br />surpass the mandatory thresholds for an EAW and therefore is not required. <br />Environmental Board. The City's Environmental Board reviewed the request on March <br />27, 2002 and June 26, 2002 and recommended denial of the request due to excessive wet <br />characteristics of the site, and incomplete information needed to process the plat. Note: <br />All information required has been submitted by the developer. They also submitted <br />recommendations to consider if the proposal is approved. These comments are attached <br />and, were applicable, have been incorporated in this report. <br />Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The developer has made application to the <br />RCWD for approval of a Land Development Plan and a Wetland Alteration Plan. The <br />RCWD has approved a TWAFAA (Table with Authorization for Administrative Action) <br />for the proposed development. <br />Anoka County. The County has completed its review of the proposed development. The <br />County will require improvements to Birch Street (CSAH 10) so that there will be left, <br />through and right turn lanes for eastbound and westbound CSAH 10 traffic at both the <br />Sherman Lake Road and Pheasant Hills Drive intersections. The developer will be <br />required to make these improvements as part of this development. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on the findings contained in this report and subject to the conditions listed below, <br />staff recommends the following: <br />A. Approval of the MUSA Allocation subject to the following conditions: <br />Stoneybrook Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.