08/14/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• Planning & Zoning Board July 10, 2002 Page 17 Security should be required within the development agreement to insure installation of signs as well as the required monitoring. This requirement would need to be coordinated with the RCWD. All exposed soils above the Normal Water Level should be seeded with mixes consistent with City of Lino Lakes seed mixtures. The applicant should coordinate seed types with the City's Environmental Specialist. Tree Preservation. The site contained a number of Oaks in the extreme southeast comer, along the westerly property line and one on the north side adjacent to Birch Street. There was no anticipated tree loss as part of this project. The grading plan identified the installation of fencing along the drip line of the tr es Installation of tree preservation measures would be required before grading activityle .site. The developer should coordinate all tree preservation activities with ronmental Specialist. CEPTED. Officer Mike Rumps prepared ai concern with the additional traffic load on Bi hour traffic. Landscaping. A landscaping plan for scr, required. The plan consisted of a com City's Environmental Specialist wa Colorado Spruce with the White S 02. He expressed t, part icull ly with morning rush ong Bir street had been submitted as iduous and coniferous trees. The eplacement of the proposed The developer was also prop o add an & fV onal coniferous tree buffer along the northeasterly and westerly p concerns. lines in response to adjacent property owner Phasing. Th were propo 2003. ing to phase the development over two years. 52 lots 002. The remaining 50 lots would be developed in Environmental Ass - ° mer Worksheet (EAW). The proposed subdivision did not surpass the mandatory threshalas for an EAW and therefore was not required. Environmental Board. The City's Environmental Board reviewed the request on March 27, 2002 and June 26, 2002 and recommended denial of the request due to excessive wet characteristics of the site, and incomplete information needed to process the plat. They also submitted recommendations to consider if the proposal was approved. Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The developer had made application to the RCWD for approval of a Land Development Plan and a Wetland Alteration Plan. The RCWD had approved a TWAFAA (Table with Authorization for Administrative Action) for the proposed development. Anoka County. The County had completed its review of the proposed development. The County would require improvements to Birch Street (CSAH 10) so that there would be left, through and right turn lanes for eastbound and westbound CSAH 10 traffic at both