Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />July 10, 2002 <br />Page 19 <br />12. All federal, state, county, and watershed district permits shall be obtained prior to <br />commencement of site improvements. <br />13. The developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City prior to <br />commencement of site improvements. <br />Mr. Lyden expressed concern about the 29 -foot road and the maintenance of the <br />sidewalks. He stated if they went with a 29 -foot road width, they would need to put in a <br />sidewalk. Mr. Grochala stated this would be a shift in policy where the homeowners <br />would be required to maintain the sidewalks. <br />Chair Schaps also expressed concern about the 29 -foot road and the inability of <br />emergency vehicles to get through. <br />Mr. Corson stated he understood the narrower <br />were attempting to save trees. Mr. Grocha <br />there were many streets in the City that were <br />ast were allowed where they <br />tandard was 32 feet, but <br />Mr. Lyden expressed concern about the consist <br />Plan. He stated he understood at 2001 <br />another 100 homes were built this year. <br />stated one piece that was missing w <br />approved, but not built. He stated <br />population of 17,820. He stated if <br />already at their 2010 goal. He s <br />growth. He stated the whole <br />between commercial and reside <br />they needed to see <br />approve these he <br />ahead of the <br />to where the <br />plan with the Comprehensive <br />17,002 and he assumed <br />population at 17,322. He <br />of homes that had already been <br />at 2010 was to have a city <br />es already in the works, they were <br />'m that they did not need the 2010 <br />of the Co �: # ensive Plan was to have a balance <br />e stated this was not a bad plan, but at some point <br />t direction. He stated he would be happy to <br />0 goal. He stated they were already 8 years <br />s was not balanced growth and it would not get them <br />Mr. Grochala re <br />Comprehensive Plane <br />Ordinances. He stated t <br />to limit growth to the 2010 <br />the reason staff was pushing for the moratorium in January,2002 and while that <br />moratorium was granted, this development, as well as other developments had already <br />come in and the City Council allowed them to proceed. He stated this was a choice that <br />was made by the City Council at that time, even though it was not his recommendation. <br />He indicated the preliminary plat, zoning, MUSA allocation, etc. all met with the City's <br />requirements and was consistent as to what was proposed in that area for the future. <br />e of the numbers. He indicated the next step once the <br />ed was the implementation of those policies through the <br />did not currently have an Ordinance requirement in effect <br />umber at this time. He reminded the Commission that was <br />Matthew Weiland, Tollefson Development, stated they had worked very hard to address <br />the issues that the Board had requested they look at. He stated they agreed and supported <br />their recommendation. <br />Chair Schaps asked how the neighborhood meetings went. Mr. Weiland replied there <br />were a number of concerns presented by the neighborhood, especially regarding density, <br />protection of wetlands, drainage and pending issues, buffers, protection of trees, etc. He <br />