08/14/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board July 10, 2002 Page 29 Mr. Lyden asked how high was the berm. Mr. Lampert stated approximately 3 feet, with landscaping on top. He indicated this was a one -story building, and it was difficult to conceal a one -story building with a berm, but by adding landscaping, this would be a sufficient buffer. He stated there would be a 50 -foot setback to the residential district. He stated the drain field location would be adjusted slightly to the east. Mr. Lyden asked what the Comprehensive Plan said regarding land use for this property. Ms. Gretz replied it was sewered residential. She stated they should not confuse zoning with land use in this case. Mr. Smyser stated when/if this property was to be rezoned for residential, the Church would still be a conditional use in all of the residenti .1 zones as well. It did not matter what the zoning was for a Church. Ms. Gretz stated the church height was with y req'" and the steeple was exempt from the height requirement. Dick Keiser, 12 Indian Hills Drive, Circle Pine, k Aut the depth of the ponds. Mr. Raske stated they ranged from 2 to 10 feet de Mr. Keiser expressed concern about they playing in/around the ponds), especiall the high water level was calculate 100 -year flood. There would be ence ar Mr. Kula suggested a landscap landscaping select respect to the ponds (i.e. kids feet deep. Mr. Raske stated and the ponds were designed for a ond. any be utilized for the purposes of berming and Mr. Corson m = MOTIO - ® se the ' ublic Hearing at 10:22 p.m. The Motion wassu ' orted by . fferty. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Hyden inquired about to gravel driveway. Ms. Gretz replied that was for construction purposes and it would be paved after construction. Chair Schaps noted if this was a self - constructed site, how long was the building permit good for. Mr. Grochala replied building permits were approved for a 12 — 18 month period. The building inspectors would make sure the site was moving along. Mr. Rafferty asked for clarification about the berming. He requested they firm up the landscaping issues. Mr. Lampert replied the neighbors had requested a landscaping buffer instead of a fence. He stated at this time, they had not come up with a landscaping plan, but they would submit it to staff for their approval. Chair Schaps asked if they agreed to all of the recommendations of staff. Mr. Lampert replied they did.