Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 14, 2002 <br />Page 12 <br />With respect to utilities, staff stated a utility plan has been submitted for review by the <br />City Engineer. Water and Sanitary sewer service were provided to service the site as part <br />of the Lake /Apollo Drive improvement project. As a condition of preliminary plat <br />approval, the utility related modifications and comments as set forth in the City <br />Engineer's memo should to be incorporated into the plans. <br />Staff indicated a grading and drainage plan has been submitted for review by the City <br />Engineer. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, the grading and drainage related <br />modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo should to be <br />incorporated into the plans. The plan is also subject to review and approval from the <br />Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />Staff stated as shown on the preliminary plat <br />proposed along all property lines and over w <br />of such easements should be subject to c <br />Engineer. <br />As a condition of final plat approval, cross <br />recorded with the property. Such easem <br />the City Attorney. <br />Staff stated the tree preservatio <br />grading plan. According to the p <br />Of those significant trees, 16 <br />protected by snow fence prior <br />utility easements have been <br />are . s. The acceptability <br />tion by the City <br />s easements will need to be <br />to review and approval by <br />perimposed upon the preliminary <br />2 si ees exist upon the subject property. <br />saved ees to be saved are to be flagged and <br />ction. <br />As part of the <br />result, the pr <br />commercia <br />With the sub <br />dedication of $1 <br />it <br />subdiv <br />opment, a p <br />comprisin <br />'>11 be <br />rty, park dedication was not received. As a <br />ill be ` ubject to park dedication requirements. For <br />dication requirement of $2,175 per acre is required. <br />acres of upland area (exclusive of ponding), a park <br />ed prior to the recording of the subdivision. <br />Staff indicated the En ntal Board reviewed the request at their July 31, 2002 <br />meeting and recommended ;`.proval. Their comments are attached to this report. <br />The CEPTED review was completed on June 21, 2002. The primary issues, as addressed <br />on the attached report, regard traffic flow through the development. The development <br />has been redesigned to address these issues. <br />The proposed development is subject to Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) <br />approval for both a Land Development Permit and a Wetland Alteration Permit. The <br />RCWD has not taken final action on the request. <br />With respect to site and building plan review, the applicant is seeking site and building <br />plan approval to allow the construction of a 14,172 square foot retail commercial center <br />upon proposed Lot 4. At such time when specific development projects exist for the <br />remaining lots in the subdivision (Lots 1 -3), they will likewise be subject to a site and <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />