09/11/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board August 14, 2002 Page 24 is needed regarding if they should be dedicated to the City as green space or held in private ownership by the homeowners' association. Staff stated Carl Street right -of -way traverses the proposed plat. A portion of Carl Street will require vacation with the platting of the new Carl Street alignment. The vacation of this right -of -way will have to be done through a public hearing held by the City Council. The Planning Commission will need to make a finding that the vacation of this right -of- way is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that there is no current or future anticipated public need to return the right -of -way. In review of the proposed street alignments, they feel that with the platting of the new Carl Street alignment, the old right - of -way is no longer necessary for either street or utility purposes and vacation would be appropriate. Staff noted the applicant has shown an area accessory buildings that would be used a purchase a lot and still have access to the ai Block 6 of the 2nd Addition. The hangars ar the William Brothers pipeline, a gas line ease proposed hangar space may be a more ap introducing single family homes in close nded for the construction of residents who wish to ocated on Lot 16, at is encumbered by ;nsideration of the land use, the this location rather than as pipeline. Staff stated access to the hangars wou ugh the airport. If this were to proceed ahead, we would ask that d of e hangar construction, including elevations, be provided to insure ®• he h uld be designed in a manner that is compatible and complementary e surro single- family homes. Additionally, we would like to see an association established for the hangars that would outline the terms under whic� ce air v ership would be established. Access into the hangar area should 1 Street for emergency vehicles, as well as general user In conclusion as detern to cl that the application is incomplete. Initially, the submittal was re vs° July 002. At that time, issues of concern, comments, and an outline of the su id to complete application were provided. To date, not all the information has eived. The City staff recommends that the City open the public hearing at the Augu Planning and Zoning meeting, take public comment, and then continue the public hearing to the September meeting and direct the applicant to provide the following information: 1. Grading and drainage plans for the entire preliminary plat. 2. Wetland mitigation plans. 3. A park dedication plan must be outlined and defined to be acceptable by City staff and the Park and Rec Board. 4. A landscape plan that illustrates the intended landscaping for the buffer yard abutting Sunset Road. DRAFT MINUTES