My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/11/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
09/11/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2014 3:36:22 PM
Creation date
6/6/2014 12:10:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/11/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 14, 2002 <br />Page 25 <br />5. The plat should illustrate the flight safety zones necessary to allow Lino Airpark <br />to continue to operate in the future without negatively impacting the newly <br />created single family lots. <br />6. Public Works should provide comments as to the acceptability of landscape <br />islands within the proposed cul -de -sac areas. <br />7. The applicant should describe how the wetlands and outlots will be utilized or <br />owned pertinent to the establishment of greenway corridors and whether they will <br />become public open space or owned privately through a homeowners' <br />association. <br />8. A concept plan be that illustrates the future <br />being surrounded by the Behms Ce <br />potential street corridors and lot con <br />negatively impacting Sunset Drive (c <br />currently requested. <br />on of the exceptions (that are <br />reliminary plat) including <br />be implemented without <br />bdivision that is <br />The applicant should provide a description of arcchitec <br />imposed on the proposed hangar area as <br />would guarantee continued maintenance <br />Chair Schaps invited applicant to <br />John Johnson, the applicant's <br />County Road D, Little Canada. <br />regarding alteratio <br />dards that would be <br />ssociation rules that <br />er, Metro �`6 Surveying & Engineering, 412 <br />uested feedback and direction from the Board <br />ary of the proposal. <br />Ferrill Robin <br />collector stree <br />the traffic im <br />of service for se <br />west minor collector <br />RF Consu <br />He reviewed t% <br />e area frog <br />very tion <br />roup,'summarized the proposal for the roads and <br />ffic report prepared on behalf of the applicant and <br />resent to 2015. The report includes expected levels <br />year 2015 conditions, it was assumed that the east - <br />uld be constructed north of Carl Street. <br />Mr. Lyden asked what percent of traffic went north v. south on the collector street. Mr. <br />Robinson summarized that information from the report. Mr. Lyden asked if they had <br />assumed there would be a cloverleaf at I35W and Main. Mr. Robinson replied they had <br />not assumed there was going to be a cloverleaf at I35W and Main. <br />Mr. Smyser stated this traffic report was inconsistent with what was discussed previously. <br />He stated the developer does not want to connect to Carl Street, even though staff <br />recommends there is a connection. He stated there were a number of concerns among <br />residents regarding traffic if the road went through. He stated the design did allow the <br />road to be built, which would not impact the existing homes as far as setback issues. He <br />stated the problem with putting this off into the future is that they would be creating a <br />new neighborhood that had only outlets onto Sunset and this was something to be <br />avoided. The other things is that if this road did not get connected to Carl Street, staff <br />had no idea when/if the connection would be made. He stated if they created a <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.