My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/11/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
09/11/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2014 3:36:22 PM
Creation date
6/6/2014 12:10:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/11/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� TKDA <br />TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON <br />AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED <br />• <br />• <br />ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Jim Studenski, City of Lino Lakes <br />Copies To: Scott Brink, TKDA <br />From: Steven Elmer <br />1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA <br />444 CEDAR STREET <br />SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 <br />PHONE: 651/292 -4400 FAX: 651/292 -0083 <br />Reference: Review of Traffic Analysis for <br />Behm's Century Farm, 6th and 7th Additions <br />Project. <br />Date: August 23, 2002 Commission No. 12475 -002 <br />As requested, I have reviewed the draft technical memorandum prepared by SRF Consulting <br />Group documenting a traffic analysis for the Behm's Century Farm, 6t and 7th Additions Project <br />dated August 5, 2002. I have reviewed their technical analysis and recommendations and have <br />the following comments and conclusions: <br />1. The traffic analysis is based on the premise that "LOS A through D are generally <br />considered acceptable by drivers." While it may be true that level of service D is <br />considered acceptable to drivers in densely developed urban situations, the same may not <br />be true in rural and outer suburban locations. Drivers' experience with and tolerance for <br />delay varies in urban and rural locations and LOS C is more typical of the upper limit for <br />acceptable delay in rural areas. Given this assumption, the following intersections would <br />operate at an unacceptable LOS under 2009 and/or 2015 conditions: <br />Intersection <br />* Main Street/Sunset Avenue <br />* Lilac Street/Sunset Avenue <br />* Main Street/Fourth Avenue <br />'LOS D for single approach only. <br />2 LOS F for one approach. <br />Year 2009 Year 2015 <br />LOS D LOS F <br />LOS D1 <br />LOS D2 <br />2. The traffic study concludes that "the east -west minor collector route between Sunset <br />Avenue and 4th Avenue will not be needed to support the proposed development until <br />after Year 2009." Given the assumptions and findings above, this conclusion would not <br />hold. <br />An Equal Opportunity Employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.