10/09/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• Planning & Zoning Board September 11, 2002 Page 13 Chair Schaps asked if he understood the concerns about the emergency vehicle access. Mr. Obowa replied he did. Mr. Lyden stated he had not seen anything from the police department, fire department, etc. that there was a concern and requested seeing something in writing. Mr. Smyser replied they would follow -up and obtain a report. Mr. Zych noted that this was an opportunity to do this right and allow for sufficient emergency vehicle access. Chuck Kolstad, 296 Carl Street, expressed concern about the "jogging" of the proposed Carl Street. He noted an emergency vehicle would . t make this jog without considerably slowing down. He stated he did not w s in his front yard indicating the street curved to the right. He indicated an e cle could not make it any faster into the development by taking Carl be e off`® the oad. He stated he believed the City already had their mind made o Car w ®H ugh. He expressed concern about vehicles ending up in yard or '.ecause they could not make the turn. He stated most residents on ' = were opposed to this. He urged the Board to see his point of view as a ®omeo City. Tom Schmelzer, 398 Carl Street, suppo concern about dividing up the neighbo was unfortunate developments we concern for the safety of landing ft. on of Carl Street. He expressed ing Carl Street. He stated it main design. He expressed Glenn Martig, 376 Carl Street, Sunset should be was dangerous. pointed out an street were ith Mr. Kolstad that with two outlets going to ehicles and the proposed bends in Carl Street, they would be living on a cul -de -sac. He e new evelopment would know where the collector ad a cul -de -sac. Mr. Lyden made Planning & Zoning B ° g. tinue the Public Hearing to the October, 2002 The motion was supported :` Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Lyden requested public safety information regarding specifics. He requested the Air Park officers get together and come up with a list of what their concerns were. He stated they did not have the right to destroy a current neighborhood for the development of a new neighborhood. Chair Schaps agreed the Air Park needed to submit a letter and requested they address if the extension of the street in any fashion would affect their property, their neighborhood, etc. He invited anyone else in that neighborhood to also offer opinions in writing. He stated overall he had a concern about emergency vehicle access into the new development. He stated an alternative would be for Mr. Uhde to purchase the sod farm property, but there would still be challenges Mr. Uhde would need to work out. He noted