10/09/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board September 11, 2002 Page 2 as it did not fulfill the definition of a pole barn, there would be no problem. He stated as long as the building did not have metal skin and poles in the ground, the City would not view this as a pole barn. However, he would still be required to meet the other Code requirements. He indicated this expansion was a good idea, as long as it was not a pole barn construction. Mr. Lyden asked if the definition of a pole barn was the material that was used on the outside. Mr. Smyser replied that was one of the factors. Mr. Lyden pointed out the City should not have a problem with the metal roof, considering the City Hall had a metal roof. Chair Schaps asked if the building inspector could 1 pole barn. Mr. Smyser replied he had checked building inspector agreed that as long as ther building, it was not a pole barn. to determine if it was a ing inspector, and the s . d metal skin on the Mr. McDonald noted on the surveyor's map h s = d when he added the last addition on, it was noted that at some point the back of the building. Chair Schaps informed Mr. McDonald commercial site and building plan s intending on adding onto staff and submit a Mr. Lyden made a MOTION t , Y - Open X6:50 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4 -0. V. ACTION ITE Severson, 82XX W. Rondeau Lake Rd., Minor Staff explained Ms. C d Mr. Severson are applying for a Minor Subdivision of approximately 32 acres o , zoned Rural, on the 82XX block of West Rondeau Lake Road. The applicant would like to create two lots: one lot of 21.69 acres and one lot of 10.43 acres. Staff presented its analysis by explaining the Certificate of Survey shows the proposed division of the 32 -acre parcel. Parcel A, 21.69 acres, contains 22 % upland. Parcel B, 10.43 acres, does not have upland delineated on the survey, but as aerial photos show the land to have been in agriculture (and now in pasture), meeting the 20% minimum upland requirement does not appear to be an issue. Staff explained the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is ten acres. Both of the two proposed lots will meet this requirement. Staff stated the minimum lot width for property in a Rural zone is 330 feet, and both lots meet this requirement. In addition, both lots will have full frontage on a road, as required