My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/08/2003 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2003
>
01/08/2003 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 12:11:20 PM
Creation date
6/10/2014 8:49:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
01/08/2003
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 11, 2002 <br />Page 16 <br />even occurs virtually every year. In my opinion to build extensive housing in this area <br />without basements is, to put it as diplomatically as I can, very unwise. Yes, I know the <br />building code does not require basements and yes, I know that there are already extensive <br />developments in Lino Lakes and elsewhere that do not have basements. These are not <br />reasons to continue to make this mistake. At the very least a shelter capable of protecting <br />all the residents without basements should be built in the development. (This is required <br />in trailer parks.) Mr. Uhde's suggestion was that residents could build a tornado proof <br />room within their housing unit. How many people will opt for this? My guess is very <br />few. I personally experienced the tornadoes (2) that struck Fridley in 1965. Over 500 <br />homes were destroyed. Because virtually all of these homes had basements only 2 lives <br />were lost. If a similar event were to strike one of these new, high density, multi -story <br />development with no basements, the loss of life will be much greater than it needed to be. <br />Sometimes there are more important things to consider than a developer's desire or the <br />dictates of the Metropolitan Council. If this housing cannot be built with at least partial <br />basements or some other shelter for tornado protection, in my opinion, it should not be <br />built at all. At the November 7 meeting several of the residents, including myself, <br />requested additional information on items of great concern to us. I requested plans <br />showing the elevation of a proposed storm sewer with respect to the elevation of my <br />driveway and plans detailing proposed tree preservation. Our addresses were recorded <br />and it was promised the information would be sent to us. Mr. Uhde delivered some plans <br />to my house in person last night (12 -10). I appreciate his effort, despite it's lateness to <br />comply with my request. Unfortunately the plans he provided did not supply the <br />information I requested. The preliminary grading plan he supplied shows the contour of <br />the property the way it is now, not the way it will be after the project is completed, and is <br />therefore of little value to me in evaluating possible future water drainage problems. A <br />call to Mr. Uhde this morning produced a promise that I could see an elevation plan of <br />the development after it's completion at tonight's meeting. Hopefully this will be the <br />case and I will be satisfied with what I see. Hopefully the board and city engineers have <br />had this information for some time and had a change to evaluate it. I also found the plans <br />showing tree preservation to be very deficient in terms of accuracy and detail. In some <br />cases tree preservation areas are right next to or actually intersect with proposed houses — <br />this can not be. I expected to see some actual tress (sic) plotted rather than just huge <br />areas shaded in. The lack of any detail makes it look as though these plans are merely <br />going through the motions without a serious intent to preserve any trees at all. Also, <br />seeing a final contour plan would make any tree preservation much more believable. If <br />the property is to be seriously re- contourted it will be virtually impossible to preserve <br />trees. I hope that the board will give my written comments as much weight as if they <br />were presented orally at the meeting. I often cannot find the time to attend the meetings. <br />I also, like many people, find it difficult to express myself in a public speaking setting. <br />Especially the intimidating setting of the seven board members up on their `thrones' <br />looking down on the citizens at the podium. (A less authoritative setting would produce <br />a freer exchange of thought, if that is truly what is desired.) I also think I organize my <br />thoughts much better and more completely in writing. And it should even same some <br />time at the meeting. I would however appreciate some minimal feedback, if that is <br />possible." <br />Mr. Hyden stated with respect to Carl Street he was still unsure about that and he <br />requested information from the police and fire department, as well as some hard data on <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.