Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 8, 2003 <br />Page 28 <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to the February 12, 2003 <br />meeting and table consideration of the MUSA Reserve Allocation (85.3 acres), <br />the Rezoning from Rural to R -1, Single Family Residential and R -3, Medium Density <br />Residential, a PUD to allow airplane hangers, private streets, and multiple buildings on a <br />single lot, and the preliminary plat for Century Farm North Development Inc. for a 250 <br />unit low and medium density residential development (Century Farm North) located upon <br />a 95.1 acres site north of Thomas Street and east of Sunset Road, and was supported by <br />Mr. Rafferty. <br />Mr. Lyden asked about the location of a driveway and unit. Mr. Smyser stated there are a <br />number of issues that staff will resolve with the applicant and that is one which will need <br />to be addressed. <br />Chair Schaps thanked Eilene Couture, the representative from the St. Joe's Social Justice <br />Committee, and stated that all need to keep in mind the need for life -cycle housing. <br />Motion carried 5 -0. <br />Mr. Smyser noted they will have to re- examine how fire trucks gain access to these <br />hangers since there will be no paved taxi lane. <br />Mr. Johnson stated he spoke with the Fire Chief today who indicated that the State <br />Building Code is in the process of being revised. If approved, the hangers would need to <br />have automatic sprinkler systems which would change the impact for Fire Department <br />access. He stated it will be 30 days until the State adopts that code and then it will take <br />the City a while to consider adoption. <br />E. Jim Keefe, 6300 Rolling Hills Drive, Keefe Minor Subdivision <br />Jim Keefe, 6300 Rolling Hills Drive, stated he appreciates the opportunity to present his <br />case. He noted that all of the P &Z members have viewed his property. He explained that <br />he is attempting to split out two five -acre parcels and would end up with 37.5 acres of <br />land with three homes on the property. He stated that would not meet the requirements of <br />the ordinance to a "T" but would meet the spirit of the ordinance. He stated this is a <br />fairly unique piece of property and there is not a whole lot left he can do with it. He <br />stated his access to sewer and water is cut off so he is trying to do what he can with what <br />he has left. <br />Chair Schaps asked if, in general, Mr. Keefe's request is allowable. Mr. Smyser stated <br />there is a minimum ten acre lot size in unsewered areas and this area is guided for <br />Residential, Sewered in Stage 2 (after 2010). He explained that the problem with making <br />large lot developments in this area is that it will prevent utilities from coming through in <br />the future. Then property owners who want the improvements will not be able to afford <br />the assessments to serve them. That creates gaps where you cannot extend City sewer <br />and water. He stated this is an instance where a proposal goes completely against the <br />Comprehensive Plan and would require many variances of the Zoning Ordinance. He <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />