Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 8, 2003 <br />Page 29 <br />stated it is not a matter of whether staff wants or does not want this to be approved, but a <br />matter that the City made some decisions on what was to happen in areas at certain times. <br />There are guidelines that if development is to occur, there are ways to do that. He stated <br />there is a long public policy determination process that takes years to complete and then <br />things come up so the issue is what credibility the City's policy have if the rules are made <br />and then ignored. <br />Chair Schaps stated he understands those concerns and that with every set of rules there <br />may have to be an exception. He reviewed the surrounding property uses to the Keefe <br />property, noting that to the north is Clearwater Creek so there will be no service from that <br />area; to the east there is only wetland that will not be developed and if service came from <br />that direction the cost would be unapproachable; to the south the property is developed <br />with wells and septics; and to the west it is wetland. He stated he understands what the <br />Comprehensive Plan says but thinks this is a situation that may not have been addressed <br />and if there is any reasonable use of this property it may have to be through well and <br />septic development. <br />Mr. Smyser stated he has no way of knowing how sewer and water could come to this <br />property since no feasibility studies have been done. He noted that the submittal by Mr. <br />Keefe show just a few of the one acre lots to the south that are served by well and septic, <br />and they have been in place for a very long time. He commented on the Twilight Acres <br />area where septics started to fail and there were no other locations on those one acre lots <br />to locate another septic. He stated that eliminating land from being available for City <br />sewer and water eliminates it for other land as well due to the cost to extend <br />improvements. <br />Mr. Smyser stated it may be correct that this is an area that merits closer attention and <br />that is a possibility. He stated that staff would fully support re- examining areas more <br />closely but staff does not support just throwing out the adopted rules and granting <br />approval. <br />Chair Schaps stated he does not support throwing out adopted rules either but thinks this <br />may be one area that needs to be readdressed. He noted this property is high ground so <br />he thinks it could be served by a well and septic for a very long time. <br />Mr. Smyser stated another option is clustering and open space guarantees which is <br />allowed under the current ordinance. He stated that to approve this request would result <br />in abandoning the City's Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances and he could not support <br />that. <br />Mr. Keefe stated there is no way sewer and water can come to his property in any way <br />except, perhaps, from the south. He noted that there are small lots to the south but then <br />there are acres of open land. <br />Chair Schaps stated that he understands the concerns raised by Mr. Smyser and the need <br />for Mr. Keefe to have this considered in a timely manner. He stated that he thinks <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />