03/12/2003 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• Planning & Zoning Board February 12, 2003 Page 19 DRAFT MINUTES Mr. Rafferty asked about the rezoning issues. He stated what the zoning issues were and what they needed to change and why. Mr. Kirmis replied it was a combination of using a PDO for the Airpark lots. He noted the R -1 would apply to traditional, family homes and R -3 would apply to the multi - family homes. Mr. Johnson stated what had been given to the Planning Board was in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Smyser noted the Comprehensive Plan did not state what the zoning should be, just what the density should be. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to allocate the MUSA Reserve Allocation of 85.3 acres with staff input. The motion was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 5 -0 -1 (Mr. Tralle - Abstained). Mr. Corson made a MOTION for rezoning from R (rural) to R -1 (single family residential) and R -3, Medium Density Residential as laid out in the development plan with all staff conditions as related to this motion. The motion was supported by Hyden. Mr. Lyden asked for a friendly amendment from R -1 to R -1X zoning. Mr. Smyser replied the plan was designed to meet the R -1 standards, not the R -1X standards. Mr. Corson rejected the friendly amendment. Motion carried 4 -1 -1 (Mr. Lyden — Nay. Mr. Tralle - Abstained). Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to deny a PDO to allow airplane hangers, private streets and multiple buildings on a single lot. The motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion failed 2 -3 -1 (Mr. Lyden and Mr. Rafferty — Aye. Ms. Lane, Mr. Corson, and Mr. Hyden — Nay. Mr. Tralle — Abstained.) Mr. Corson made a MOTION to recommend a PDO to allow airport hangers, private streets, and multiple buildings on a single lot. The motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried (4 -1 -1) (Mr. Lyden — Nay. Mr. Tralle — Abstained). Mr. Corson made a MOTION to recommended that new Carl Street as shown as in the plat have a temporary cul -de -sac, and that it remain as shown on the property line for future consideration as need; that the 14 recommendations of staff be approved, including the recommendation of the Board to "dress up" the side of the townhomes, and to approve the Preliminary Plat. The motion was supported by Ms. Lane. Mr. Rafferty stated he was objecting to a temporary cul -de -sac and would not be supporting this motion. Mr. Lyden also opposed a temporary cul -de -sac. He stated he wanted assurances that Carl Street would not go through in the future. Mr. Corson noted his motion made it possible for Carl Street to go through, if necessary. Mr. Kirmis suggested the condition be that new Carl Street be extended to the eastern property line and provided a turn around. He stated a temporary cul -de -sac had a DRAFT MINUTES