Laserfiche WebLink
Noise mitigation is not proposed at this time. All City and County roads in the area are exempt from <br />state noise standards. The only nearby road that is not exempt from State noise standards is I -35W. <br />Noise levels along the local roadways are not anticipated to exceed State noise standards, nor are they <br />anticipated to be greater than noise levels that are commonly experienced within a residential and <br />commercial area. Furthermore, adequate building setbacks and acoustical site planning techniques <br />could be further considered in the placement and arrangement of buildings to shield more sensitive <br />land uses from noise impacts. <br />25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? <br />Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? X Yes _ No <br />Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? _Yes X No <br />Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? X Yes _No <br />Scenic views and vistas? _Yes X No <br />Other unique resources? _Yes X No <br />If yes, describe the resource and identify any project - related impacts on the resource. Describe <br />any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. <br />A preliminary archaeological assessment was completed on June 13, 2003 for the proposed site and is <br />summarized below. <br />• The archaeological assessment investigation revealed that the area has both a high and <br />moderate potential for containing pre - contact archaeological resources. The area has <br />undergone little or no modern disturbances, consisting of grass/brush areas with scattered tree <br />cover. The exception to this are the backslopes to Interstate I -35W and CSAH 23. Areas of <br />the study also contained marsh grasses indicating frequent inundation, but these were <br />minimal. The backslopes to Interstate I -35W and CSAH 23 are areas that were disturbed by <br />construction of those roads. They are considered to have low potential for post- contact <br />archaeological resources. <br />• Because no buildings or structures were known to have existed in the study area during the <br />post- contact period, the study area is considered to have little or no potential for post contact <br />archaeological resources. <br />• A National Register eligible archaeological district is located just to the east of this property. • <br />• The higher terrace in the eastern portion of the study area is part of a topographically <br />prominent feature that overlooks and is within 500 feet of a substantial body of water, <br />Marshan Lake. Also, because the study area is almost completely undisturbed, the portion of <br />the terrace within the study area is considered to have high potential for intact precontact <br />archeological resources. <br />• The lower terrace is part of a terrace overlook adjacent to Marshan Lake and is undisturbed. <br />It would typically be considered to have a high potential for intact archaeological resources. <br />However, based on the height this terrace is in comparison to the higher terrace coupled with <br />the further distance from Marshan Lake and from the stream to which the lake is connected, <br />this portion of the study area is considered to have moderate potential for intact precontact <br />archaeological resources. <br />These findings were submitted to State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for their review and <br />concurrence. A response letter dated July 11, 2003 from SHPO recommends that a survey of the area <br />be completed because there is a good probability that unreported archaeological properties might be <br />present in the project area (see Appendix B). The letter further states that if the project area can be <br />documented as previously disturbed or previously surveyed, the need for a survey would be re- <br />evaluated. <br />Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 20 <br />Lino Lakes, MN <br />