Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Circle -Lex VFW <br />page 7 <br />1) If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or <br />B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of <br />service more than one grade. <br />2) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by <br />a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. <br />3) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by <br />a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. <br />4) The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing <br />access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision <br />developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to <br />ensure a level of service D or better. <br />5) Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the <br />structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed <br />subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. <br />6) The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street <br />improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement <br />Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer- financed <br />improvements to correct any street deficiencies. <br />7) The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- <br />35W/Lake Drive or I- 35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange <br />impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota <br />Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements <br />needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the <br />subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time <br />frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, <br />including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and <br />other properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange. <br />8) The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. <br />• Traffic generated by the new building will increase somewhat over the <br />existing use, but is not expected to create ongoing traffic problems. Large <br />events will bring additional vehicles periodically. However, 100± vehicles <br />will not create a safety hazard or significant impacts. The Apollo Drive and <br />Main St. intersections with Lake Drive both are controlled intersections. If, in <br />the future, traffic becomes an issue, the City can revisit the CUP and consider <br />adding additional conditions such as traffic control personnel for large events. <br />e. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. <br />f. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer <br />system. <br />• The new building will be connected to city water and sanitary sewer. <br />g. <br />The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City <br />funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. <br />• There will be no city capital expenditures for this project. <br />h. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of <br />operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare <br />because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. <br />