12/10/2003 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Eagle Brook Church Review Page 8 December 4, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 3. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. 4. Water pipe and appurtenances shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino lakes, and as follows: Hydrants - Waterous Pacer WB -67; Valves - Mueller A2370 -20 or equal. DIP pipe shall be Class 52. City standards must be identified on the plan or provided on a detail sheet. Well installation shall and the water distribution system shall conform to the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health and Department of Natural Resources as applicable. 5. The Grading and Utility Plans shall include notes providing for erosion and sedimentation control. 6. All storm sewer pipes must be RC pipe. Pipe sizes, grades, and structure invert and rim elevations must be provided. Additional Comments 1. Typical street and pavement sections (pavement section and design) must be provided. All street, driveway, and parking area components shall as a minimum, meet Mn/DOT and City of Lino Lakes Engineering Standards. 2. The building will be protected by a wet pipe fire sprinkler system in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Minnesota State Fire Code, and National Fire Protection Association Standards. Further requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, such as the number and location of hydrants shall be subject to review and approval of the City Fire Chief. 3. A 30kW generator is proposed to be installed for back -up and safety items only, such as emergency lighting, exit signs, fire alarms, security and communications systems. 4. An existing 100 foot wide utility easement (Document No. 1187297), located approximately 1300 feet west of and parallel to County Road 21 runs north -south across the entire site. Overhead power lines currently exist within the easement. The church site as proposed does not show any surface improvements within the easement area with the exception of some grading and underground sanitary and storm sewer work. A significant portion of the proposed County Ditch 72 realignment also falls within the boundaries of this easement. It is therefore recommended that the existing utility easement be reviewed to verify its extent of coverage (utilities, drainage, power lines, etc.). Expansion of the existing easement or the establishment of new easements as needed shall be required to cover the proposed storm sewer. 5. Full Drainage Calculations must be provided. Summary sheets showing storm water runoff rates for 2 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year events have been provided, as well as pond volume calculations. However, full calculations showing all supporting data, computations, and design assumptions must be provided.