Laserfiche WebLink
Eagle Brook Church <br />page 8 <br />• redevelopment of properties on the north and south of the site. The application does not <br />include that option, but it is worth consideration. <br />• <br />• <br />There are numerous private driveways along 20th Ave. Just 700 feet south of the site is <br />the 77th St. intersection, and Rehbein St. is 400 feet south of that. The City's <br />comprehensive plan guides the 10 -acre properties on the south for sewered development. <br />Though the present owners may have no intention to subdivide in the immediate future, it <br />is probable that the ten -acre properties to the south will subdivide sometime in the future <br />once public sewer and water are available to the area. This is nothing unusual. If fact, it <br />is the norm, and the City should plan for it. Planning for potential future development <br />includes determining good locations for roads to serve future development. <br />The project proposal includes adding two new accesses to CSAH 21 that serve only one <br />property. One way to mitigate the potential impacts of creating these additional conflict <br />points is to design them to accommodate future public roads. Dedication of' road <br />easements on the - north and south boundaries of the project site would support this <br />However, 77th St. also could provide the access for the future development to the south of <br />the church site. Future development of that land would then be required to install public <br />utilities and reconstruct 77th St. to accommodate the additional traffic. Therefore, we do <br />not believe it necessary to require additional public road easements. <br />Parking: The plan provides for adequate parking, as indicated in the table below. It <br />is possible that the church will expand in the future. The EAW analysis included the <br />potential expansion. If the hypothetical expansion of 700 seats occurs, it would require <br />an additional 233 parking spaces. The plan accommodates this potential with a grassy <br />area south of the western parking lot area. <br />It is common practice in Lino Lakes to attempt to minimize the impervious surface. Only <br />23% of the site will be impervious surface. The plan proposes 47 more parking spaces <br />than required. The elimination of 47 spaces would amount to one double row. This <br />would not accomplish much and would negatively affect the circulation design within the <br />parking lot. <br />Traffic: For several reasons, traffic is the most difficult issue to address. The <br />traffic analysis prepared for the EAW concluded that the peak periods will create <br />unacceptable levels of service at 35E ramps and at 20th Ave./Main St. Under the City's <br />site plan and CUP requirements, this would be justification for denial of a project unless <br />Zoning Ord. Parking Space <br />Requirement <br />Spaces <br />Required <br />Spaces <br />Provided <br />worship area: <br />2100 seats <br />1 space per 3 seats <br />700 <br />other <br />1 per classroom, other <br />13 <br />total <br />713 <br />760 <br />plus potential <br />for addl. 300+ <br />It is common practice in Lino Lakes to attempt to minimize the impervious surface. Only <br />23% of the site will be impervious surface. The plan proposes 47 more parking spaces <br />than required. The elimination of 47 spaces would amount to one double row. This <br />would not accomplish much and would negatively affect the circulation design within the <br />parking lot. <br />Traffic: For several reasons, traffic is the most difficult issue to address. The <br />traffic analysis prepared for the EAW concluded that the peak periods will create <br />unacceptable levels of service at 35E ramps and at 20th Ave./Main St. Under the City's <br />site plan and CUP requirements, this would be justification for denial of a project unless <br />