12/10/2003 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• Eagle Brook Church page 12 c. The potential increased intensity and size of use does not cause an increase in traffic volumes beyond the capacity of the surrounding streets. • The additional 14' of building height does not increase traffic volume. d. Public utilities and services are adequate. • The church will construct its own water and sanitary sewer facilities. e. For each additional story over the district limitation or for each additional ten (10) feet above the maximum allowed per district, front and side yard setback requirements shall be increased by ten (10) percent. • As noted in the zoning standards table above, the setbacks are well beyond minimum requirements. f. The construction does not limit solar access to abutting and /or neighboring properties. A shadow study shall be required illustrating shadow encroachment on adjoining properties. • We have not yet received the shadow study. This is pending. g. The provisions of Section 2, Subd. 2. of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. • This refers to the general CUP criteria discussed above. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on October 29, 2003. Their comments are attached . This report addresses the parking issue, stormwater, conservation easement, utility connections, screening, and prairie management, and lighting. Phosphorous is being reviewed by the City Engineer. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending tabling this application to the December meeting. There are numerous unresolved issues that include fundamental site design elements. These include the existing house on the site, clarifications of drainage design issues, clarification of roadway design issues, and traffic management policies. The list below includes the issues that definitely need to be addressed before P & Z approval (the first four), as well as conditions that should be attached to the eventual approval. 1. The future of the existing house and other buildings must be resolved. 2. Information needed for review of the stormwater management design must be provided, as discussed in the City Engineer's memo.