Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 14, 2004 <br />Page 10 <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if the fence would be six or seven feet high. Applicant replied the <br />fence would be six feet high. <br />Chair Schaps invited the public to make comment. <br />Bert Noren, 785 Lois Lane, expressed concerns regarding parking. Mr. Smyser replied <br />the formula they used was 10 spaces per 1000 square feet, plus employees. For large <br />events that could pose problems, the City could impose additional requirements to <br />resolve such issues. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 9:13 p.m. and was supported by <br />Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4 -0. <br />Mr. Tralle asked applicant if they had ever considered purchasing Mr. Noren's and the <br />adjourning neighbors property. Dean Johnson, VFW, replied they had entertained the <br />idea of purchasing the properties, but they had not acted on it in any way. <br />Mr. Tralle stated he had a concern with the addition of future medians and the access to <br />this site. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked what was the maximum number of people that the building could <br />accommodate. Mr. Johnson replied they cold have 300 people in the dance/banquet area, <br />but realistically it would probably be closer to 200 people. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if there would be an open restaurant in the facility. Mr. Johnson replied <br />there were booths and tables, but it was not a huge eating facility. It was designed for 92 <br />people. <br />Chair Schaps asked if there was anything that would prevent cars from parking along the <br />service drive south of 79th Street. Mr. Smyser replied that was a possibility. He noted <br />Lois Lane was a public street and did allow parking. Mr. Johnson noted Lions Park was <br />also a block away, which had 79 spaces and while they could not post this as overflow <br />parking, it was available. <br />Chair Schaps asked what was the anticipated building schedule. Mr. Johnson replied <br />they wanted to start construction in the spring. <br />Mr. Hyden asked what type of signage would they have. Mr. Johnson showed an <br />example of the signage they were thinking about using. He noted the signage would be <br />attached to the building. He stated he believed the existing pole sign would be moved or <br />eliminated. <br />Chair Schaps encouraged them to eliminate the existing pole sign. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recommend approving Amendment to Conditional Use for <br />a Private Club, subject to the conditions as noted in staff's January 14, 2004 report and <br />was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 4 -0. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />