My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/10/2004 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2004
>
03/10/2004 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 12:05:52 PM
Creation date
6/13/2014 1:42:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/10/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Oakwood View <br />page 9 <br />4. Park dedication of $1,665 per unit shall be paid. Park dedication for the group residence, two <br />units, shall be paid when that lot is final platted. Park dedication for the ten single family lots <br />shall be paid with that final plat. <br />5. The new plat must obtain approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to final plat <br />approval by the City Council. <br />6. Drainage and utility easements around all wetlands must be large enough to include at a <br />minimum a ten (10) foot buffer extending outward from the delineated wetland boundary. <br />7. The applicant must submit geotechnical information on existing groundwater levels and soils <br />in adequate time for review prior to City Council consideration of the application. <br />8. Prior to consideration by the City Council, the applicant must demonstrate the adequacy of <br />the driveway to the group residence duplex in regard to emergency vehicle access, visibility, <br />and other safety and practical issues. <br />9. Information on the grading plan is unclear in the are of the south end of the property. This <br />must be clarified prior to City Council consideration of the application. <br />10. The adequacy of the water service must be determined prior to City Council consideration of <br />the application. <br />11. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo of February 26, 2004 must be addressed <br />to his satisfaction. <br />12. Lots shall be adjusted to ensure they have sufficient area without the wetland easement. <br />13. The preliminary plat shall be revised to provide for a future street connection to the west. <br />14. A revised preliminary plat showing the required changes shall be submitted for review prior <br />to City Council consideration of the application. <br />15. The City seeding mix must be used for ponds and wetland areas. This must be noted on the <br />plans. <br />16. The property owner must obtain approval from the City Council to vacate the existing <br />ponding and flowage easements. <br />17. The applicant must submit a tree preservation plan showing the grading plan superimposed <br />on the tree inventory prior to City Council consideration of the application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.