My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/14/2004 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2004
>
04/14/2004 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 11:53:59 AM
Creation date
6/13/2014 2:26:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
04/14/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 10, 2004 <br />Page 9 <br />mental retardation. She stated some residents would hold daytime jobs. She did not <br />anticipate they would need significant medical care, but it was a possibility. <br />Chair Schaps asked if the residents would drive vehicles. Ms. Penner replied they would <br />not be driving vehicles. <br />Chair Schaps asked about their parking needs. Ms. Penner replied they were flexible on <br />this, and the existing parking would be used for visitors, staff meetings, etc. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if the group home would be maintained by the church. Ms. Penner <br />replied their church had a ministry that had group homes in other states called Covenant <br />Ministries and that ministry would provide the support. She stated the home would be <br />run by a Committee that were members of their Church. She stated the only issue they <br />had right now was if the land was to be turned over to Covenant Ministries, or if it would <br />be a lease proposition, but it would still be connected to the Church. <br />Mr. Tralle asked where were the residents coming from. Ms. Penner replied they would <br />be coming from the Anoka County area through the Social Services program. She noted <br />the County was very excited about this project. She indicated they already had residents <br />they were interested in living at the home. <br />William McCully, stated the driveway location was chosen where it was because if they <br />moved it over, they would be impacting an existing retainage pond even more than they <br />already were. He stated the area they currently had the driveway in, was the best area for <br />it to be located. <br />Chair Schaps asked if there had been a neighborhood meeting and had it been well <br />attended. Mr. Yantos replied there had been a meeting and he believed it was well <br />attended. <br />Ms. Meilke, lives in middle lot, asked how far away was the parking lot from her land. <br />Chair Schaps asked if she had attended the neighborhood meeting and had she got her <br />questioned answered. Ms. Meilke replied she had attended the neighborhood meeting <br />and her questions were not answered. She stated she was concerned about the closeness <br />of the wetland. She asked if trees would be removed and noted trees were already <br />marked on the property. <br />Mr. McCully replied the building was 85 feet from her property line. Ms. Meilke asked <br />if the trees would be left, or would they be leveled. <br />Mr. McCully stated it was their intent to save as many trees as they could realizing that <br />trees would need to be removed for the driveway and parking lot. <br />Chair Schaps stated there would be a survey of the property to determine the species of <br />the trees and that could be why the trees were marked. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.