My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/14/2004 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2004
>
04/14/2004 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 11:53:59 AM
Creation date
6/13/2014 2:26:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
04/14/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 10, 2004 <br />Page 10 <br />Mr. VanDeWerken, 156 Woodridge Lane, expressed reservations about the expansion. <br />He stated they purchased their home because it was a private area with a lot of trees and <br />wildlife. He expressed losing that privacy with this development. He expressed concern <br />about an increase in traffic and the safety of the children in the area. <br />Chair Schaps pointed out that unless he owned the land, there was always the possibility <br />that adjoining land would get developed. Mr. VanDeWerken replied he understood that. <br />Chair Schaps asked if he had attended the neighborhood meeting. Mr. VanDeWerken <br />replied he was not aware there was a neighborhood meeting. <br />Chair Schaps asked if the area at the farthest northwestern portion would remain as it <br />currently was and not be developed. Mr. McCully replied that was intended to remain as <br />an open space area and would not be developed. <br />Mr. Tralle inquired about the 1000' cul -de -sac and asked if that was feasible. Mr. <br />McCully replied it was feasible. <br />Mary Ann McDougal, lives northwest of the proposed development. She asked about the <br />group home and if that development would put this land back on the tax roles. Mr. <br />Smyser replied he understood it would be owned by a nonprofit entity and therefore, <br />there would be no taxes paid. <br />Ms. McDougal asked about the open space to the north of the group home and inquired if <br />that would at some point connect the landlocked piece of land. Mr. McCully replied <br />there was no intention of connecting this. <br />Mr. Smyser stated there was no proposal to connect this and they had not even thought <br />about it. <br />Ms. McDougal asked if they could make larger lots with fewer homes and still make the <br />same amount of money. She asked the developer to consider this. <br />Ms. McDougal expressed concern about the 1000' cul -de -sac and stated she believed it <br />was too long. <br />Dan Kvinge, stated he was a neighbor, but this was not in his back yard. He thanked the <br />Board for watching for future development to the west. He asked if there was anyway <br />that the group home would turn into some other kind of group home. He stated he did <br />not have any major issues with this development. Mr. Smyser replied the City had some <br />control over a group home, but he did not have the knowledge to say if a different type of <br />group home would be controlled by the City. He stated he would research this and obtain <br />information from the City Attorney. <br />Allan Payne expressed concern about moving this to the west and the increase of traffic. <br />He asked what would happen to the value of their homes if the group home was built in <br />the area. He expressed concern about the group home changing from a mental health <br />home to a criminal rehabilitation facility. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.