My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/14/2004 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2004
>
04/14/2004 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 11:53:59 AM
Creation date
6/13/2014 2:26:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
04/14/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition <br />page 4 <br />The 1999 report on the approval of the Highland Meadows East preliminary plat included the <br />following statement: <br />For future consideration, there will be 108t feet remaining between the rear lot line of <br />Lot 1 and the Outlot A boundary directly to the south. This does not allow for the <br />minimum lot widths or depths of the existing two- or multi family residential zoning <br />districts. How Outlot A will be developed in the future has yet to be seen, but approval of <br />the present plat application should not be considered implied approval of any future plan <br />in Outlot A. <br />The proposal includes a narrowed access road as well as reduced setbacks around the periphery <br />of the site. The 26' private drive is narrower than a public street, which would be a minimum <br />28' (measured back of curb to back of curb.). The setbacks from this private drive are 22' for <br />several units, less than the normally required 25'. <br />The PUD requirements state that "front and side yard restrictions at the periphery of the Planned <br />Unit Development site at a minimum shall be the same as imposed in the respective base <br />districts. The PUD standards do not specify a rear setback minimum. Typically, a 30' rear <br />setback is required in an R -3 zone. The goal is to maintain adequate buffering around the site <br />while allowing flexibility inside the site. <br />Changes to the plan include the removal of two structures from the north central area. This <br />created extra space to move other units in order to keep a 30' setback from the site boundary <br />lines. Unit 2 is 21' from the north property line, but this is on the side of the unt. There is ample <br />space behind the unit to the east. The patios would be 20± feet from the property lines, other <br />than unit 2. <br />Landscaping has been added. As noted below, a 20' landscape buffer is required on sides <br />abutting single family zones. <br />The City Engineer's previous review noted that a swale or storm sewer is needed along the south <br />property line, which has been added. <br />R -3 zone <br />PUD <br />proposed <br />unit lot width <br />24' <br />24' <br />46' <br />setbacks <br />from street <br />side yard <br />rear yard <br />30' <br />10' <br />30' <br />25' <br />same as zoning <br />same as zoning <br />22' from private drive <br />20' <br />20' <br />impervious surface <br />65% max <br />39% <br />building separation <br />10' <br />The 1999 report on the approval of the Highland Meadows East preliminary plat included the <br />following statement: <br />For future consideration, there will be 108t feet remaining between the rear lot line of <br />Lot 1 and the Outlot A boundary directly to the south. This does not allow for the <br />minimum lot widths or depths of the existing two- or multi family residential zoning <br />districts. How Outlot A will be developed in the future has yet to be seen, but approval of <br />the present plat application should not be considered implied approval of any future plan <br />in Outlot A. <br />The proposal includes a narrowed access road as well as reduced setbacks around the periphery <br />of the site. The 26' private drive is narrower than a public street, which would be a minimum <br />28' (measured back of curb to back of curb.). The setbacks from this private drive are 22' for <br />several units, less than the normally required 25'. <br />The PUD requirements state that "front and side yard restrictions at the periphery of the Planned <br />Unit Development site at a minimum shall be the same as imposed in the respective base <br />districts. The PUD standards do not specify a rear setback minimum. Typically, a 30' rear <br />setback is required in an R -3 zone. The goal is to maintain adequate buffering around the site <br />while allowing flexibility inside the site. <br />Changes to the plan include the removal of two structures from the north central area. This <br />created extra space to move other units in order to keep a 30' setback from the site boundary <br />lines. Unit 2 is 21' from the north property line, but this is on the side of the unt. There is ample <br />space behind the unit to the east. The patios would be 20± feet from the property lines, other <br />than unit 2. <br />Landscaping has been added. As noted below, a 20' landscape buffer is required on sides <br />abutting single family zones. <br />The City Engineer's previous review noted that a swale or storm sewer is needed along the south <br />property line, which has been added. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.