Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF ORIGINATOR: <br />P & Z MEETING DATE: <br />TOPIC: <br />BACKGROUND <br />AGENDA ITEM V. B <br />Jeff Smyser <br />April 14, 2004 <br />Continued Public Hearing: <br />• Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Low Density Resid. <br />• Rezoning to Planned Unit Development <br />• PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat <br />Oakwood View <br />Rice Creek Covenant Church <br />The P & Z opened the public hearing on this project at the March meeting. The hearing was <br />continued to April. Issues included designing the extension of Oakwood Lane to provide future <br />connection, parking in the duplex lot, and use of the group residence. <br />The Rice Creek Covenant Church has submitted an application to further develop its current site <br />at 125 Ash Street. The application includes several elements. The goal is to create ten single <br />family detached home lots on the north part of the property as well as a lot for a duplex on the <br />southern part of the property. The duplex is intended for a group residence for people with <br />disabilities. <br />This project includes an odd mixture of actions because of the existing land use category and <br />zoning. The following approvals are necessary to accommodate the proposal: <br />1. Amend the comprehensive plan to change the site from Public Semi- Public to Low <br />Density Sewered Residential. <br />2. Rezoning of the southern portion from R -1X to Planned Unit Development (PUD) for <br />mixed uses: the existing church and the group residence. (The existing R1 -X zoning <br />already accommodates the single family lots on the north.) <br />3. PUD development stage plan/preliminary plat <br />A conditional use penult (CUP) was approved by the City in 1996 to provide for building the <br />church. That CUP approval included a three -phase plan. Each new building must undergo a site <br />plan review, but would not require a CUP amendment review. However, the CUP did not <br />include a residential facility, as is being proposed now. Therefore, the CUP is not relevant here <br />inasmuch as no additions to the church building itself are being proposed. <br />The zoning ordinance provides for two different types of PUD. If only residential uses were <br />included in the project, the PUD would require only a conditional use peiniit. However, the <br />church and the group residence is a mix of uses. A mixed use PUD requires a rezoning to PUD. <br />