04/14/2004 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 2004 Page 7 8. Prior to consideration by the City Council, the applicant must demonstrate the adequacy of the driveway to the group residence duplex in regard to emergency vehicle access, visibility, and other safety and practical issues. 9. Information on the grading plan is unclear in the area of the south end of the property. This must be clarified prior to City Council consideration of the application. 10. The adequacy of the water service must be determined prior to City Council consideration of the application. 11. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo of February 26, 2004 must be addressed to his satisfaction. 12. Lots shall be adjusted to ensure they have sufficient area without the wetland easement. 13. The preliminary plat shall be revised to provide for a future street connection to the west. 14. A revised preliminary plat showing the required changes shall be submitted for review prior to City Council consideration of the application. 15. The City seeding mix must be used for ponds and wetland areas. This must be noted on the plans. 16. The property owner must obtain approval from the City Council to vacate the existing ponding and flowage easements. 17. The applicant must submit a tree preservation plan showing the grading plan superimposed on the tree inventory prior to a City Council consideration of the application. 18. Site plan information for a group residence duplex shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. This shall include architectural elevations, floor plan, landscaping, and site lighting. 19. There must be a shared driveway easement to allow the new lot to use the existing driveway on Ash St. This easement must be submitted for review and be in order prior to final plat review by the City Council. Chair Schaps inquired about the parking stalls. Mr. Smyser replied he had not spoken with the applicant about this, but they were in attendance tonight for the Board's questions. Mr. Root stated traffic flow through neighborhood was very important and a 1000' cul- de -sac in a heavily populated area was not appropriate. He stated he would like to see an extension to the west, but he wanted to see how this would look. He indicated he would not approve this with a 1000' cul -de -sac. He expressed concern about the number of DRAFT MINUTES