Laserfiche WebLink
Engineering Review Page 2 April 8, 2004 <br />ox Den Acres <br />ity of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />accordance with the local Flood Insurance Rate Map. A ponding and flowage easement in favor of <br />the City of Lino Lakes, corresponding roughly to the Flood Zone limits, is also indicated on the Plan. <br />A Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) will ultimately be required to perform the improvements as <br />proposed. <br />3. Ordinary and High Water Elevations for the remaining wetlands on the site have been provided. The <br />wetland sizes and water elevations vary throughout the site. The wetland boundaries were performed <br />by Earth Sciences in September 2003. <br />4. A Resource Inventory Survey has also been prepared for this site. The site is generally undulating <br />with mixtures of wooded areas, pasture, and wetlands. Soils are generally fine sands and fine sandy <br />loams with the exception of areas of muck in the vicinity of the lower flood plain areas. The soils <br />indicated are from the Soil Survey by the USDA Soil Conservation service. However, actual soil <br />borings, including groundwater elevations have not been provided. <br />5. MUSA Boundaries: A majority of the proposed subdivision is within the MUSA Boundaries. <br />However, Parcel B along with Lots 23, 24, 25, and 27 in Block 4 on the easterly side of the <br />subdivision are not within the MUSA service area. Thus, utility services can not be provided to these <br />four lots at this time based on current MUSA Boundaries. The Developer will need to discuss with <br />City Staff the implications of the MUSA restrictions. For example, the location of a temporary cul- <br />de -sac and/or other utility placement may be necessary. <br />Also, Parcel C along with portions of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 18 are outside the current MUSA <br />service area. The MCES staff will need to be consulted to determine if there are service restrictions in <br />these circumstances. <br />Grading and Drainage <br />1. A General Stormwater Discharge Permit, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), will be <br />required in accordance with the most current requirements of NPDES Phase II and State of <br />Minnesota regulations. All NPDES regulations and requirements in accordance with the MPCA shall <br />be adhered to, including submittal to the City of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). <br />2. Sedimentation and Erosion Control must be enforced at all times during the course of all grading and <br />utility work. This includes the establishment of silt fence around all graded and disturbed areas, and <br />the sweeping of streets on a regular basis, and as directed by the City. In the event the Contractor <br />does not maintain erosion control as required, any costs incurred by the City as a result will be <br />withheld from escrows or other monies due. It is strongly suggested that a note be added to all <br />construction Plan sheets (including grading, streets, and utilities) reminding the Contractor to address <br />erosion control requirements be added to all grading and erosion control sheets. <br />3. The Grading Plan indicates that wetlands shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio per requirements of the <br />Wetland Conservation Act. At this time, it does not appear that any filling into the Flood Plain is <br />proposed. The Plans also must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). A permit <br />application has been submitted to RCWD (Permit No. 04 -039, dated March 12, 2004). RCWD has <br />determined the application to be Incomplete, pending the receipt of several additional items. All <br />requirements of the RCWD must be met. <br />