My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/09/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
02/09/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2014 1:29:42 PM
Creation date
6/18/2014 12:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/09/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 12, 2005 <br />Page 6 <br />existing detached accessory structure (garage) setback 1.2 feet from the side property <br />line. The resident was informed that the structure would either need to be made to meet <br />the 5.0 feet setback, and if it were to remain in any way, the resident would need to <br />obtain a building permit. <br />He stated the City's Building Department again contacted the resident at 2221 Reiling <br />Road on September 17, 2004 to reiterate the options for the detached accessory structure <br />(garage). <br />He noted on November 24, 2004, the Community Development Department received an <br />application for this Variance request to allow a 1.2 foot side setback for a detached <br />accessory structure (garage) where 5.0 is the minimum required by the zoning ordinance. <br />Staff presented their analysis and recommended denial of the variance based on the five <br />findings of fact outlined in staff's January 12, 2005 report. Staff also recommended <br />within 30 days of the City Council's final action, the property owner is required to apply <br />for a building permit for any portion of the un- permitted structure that is to remain. This <br />permit application will need to include a survey of the subject property along with any <br />documentation required by the Building Department. Staff stated any portion of the un- <br />permitted structure that is to remain must comply with all building code requirements and <br />within 90 days of the City Council's final action, the un- permitted structure must be <br />brought into conformance with the setback requirements. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if the original structure, without the addition, was in compliance with <br />the five foot setback. Mr. Bengtson replied the original structure was approved by the <br />City and a Building Permit had been issued. <br />Applicant was not in attendance. <br />Julianne Markiewicz, attorney for Sally Bachmeier, adjacent property owner. Stated the <br />original structure was actually 8 inches within the five foot setback, so it did violate the <br />setback. She noted her client concurred with staff's comments. She pointed out there <br />had been a cement slab over the property line and Mr. Muehlstedt cut the cement slab so <br />it was now flush with the property line. She requested that cement slab be removed. She <br />stated her client was forced to build a fence on the property line for privacy. She stated <br />the discussion in staff's memo accurately states all of the factors necessary for a variance <br />and they concurred with those findings and they would ask that the variance be denied. <br />She asked if they could add a condition that an inspection be done and another condition <br />removing the cement slab. <br />Mr. Pogalz asked if this was something that should be handled by the Court, or is this due <br />process. Chair Rafferty responded they had to handle the variance issue. <br />Mr. Tralle asked who took the photographs in their packet. Mr. Bengtson replied the <br />photographs had been submitted by the applicant. <br />Ms. Markiewicz presented photographs to the Board taken by Ms. Bachmeier. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.