My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/14/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
09/14/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2014 1:09:38 PM
Creation date
6/19/2014 12:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/14/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />Village of Hardwood Creek <br />page 7 <br />Text Amendment: The 147 Statement On Page 27 of Comprehensive Plan <br />The comprehensive plan includes a great number of goals, policies, objectives, <br />recommendations, and strategies. The Policy Plan chapter includes a list of growth <br />management goals and policies. Policy number nine is: "Limit residential growth to an <br />average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory." The growth <br />management ordinance, Ord. 24 -04, provides for amending the comprehensive plan if <br />this target is to be exceeded: <br />An amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to <br />accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth <br />(units /year)...would be exceeded (Section 2, par. 7.). <br />The amendment will include the description of the site in the Mixed Use section, as <br />explained above. However, in order to avoid confusion, it would be advisable to amend <br />the limiting statement itself to provide for the possibility of amendment described in the <br />growth management ordinance. <br />• We recommend the statement on page 27 of the comp plan should be amended to <br />read as follows: <br />9. Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year <br />supply lot inventory. Specific projects that are found to fulfill specified public <br />purposes can justify amending this comprehensive plan to exceed this limit. The <br />City Council shall consider such an amendment only if the specific development <br />project will promote a clearly identified public purpose. The public purpose may <br />include but is not limited to: <br />a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing <br />goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in <br />locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan <br />b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in <br />accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not <br />financially feasible without exceeding the target <br />c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without <br />exceeding the target <br />d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without <br />exceeding the target <br />These four public purpose examples are taken directly from the growth management <br />ordinance. These are listed as potential reasons to justify an amendment of the comp plan <br />if a project would exceed the annual growth target. Incorporating them into the comp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.