09/14/2005 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 6 2. A sign must be provided at the northern terminus of Street C and the southern terminus of Street B that indicate that the road is intended to continue in the future. 3. Homeowner's Association documentation must be submitted with the final plat application. 4. Park dedication fees must be paid in accordance with the city fee schedule. 5. A site and building plan review must be completed for both of the commercial lots prior to any commercial activities on those sites. 6. All existing structures must be removed prior to the approval of a final plat for any portion of Phase 1. 7. 4.08 acres of commercial MUSA is hereby allocated to the commercial portion of the site. 8. 20.7 acres of residential MUSA for the year 2006, and 20 acres of residential MUSA for the year 2007 are hereby allocated to the residential portion of the site. 9. City native seed mix must be used in all drainage ponds and wet areas and a 3 -year management plan must be established with a reputable management company. 10. Right -of -way for Lake Drive shall be dedicated as 60 feet from centerline. 11. A 15 -foot wide trail easement along Lake Drive will need to be dedicated to the City prior to the City Council approving any final plat for the project. This easement will need to be outside the ultimate right -of -way width for Lake Drive. 12. A sidewalk or trail connecting the private trail system to the commercial site and ultimately to the Lake Drive trail must be built as part of the first phase of this development. 13. The project is subject to Rice Creek Watershed review and approval. 14. The project is subject to Anoka County Highway Department review and approval. 15. A temporary cul -de -sac must be provided at the southern terminus of Street C. 16. Plans depicting the integration of Street A into Lois Lane must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. 17. The upland area of all lots must be confirmed to meet the 10,800 square foot requirement prior to the preliminary plat being reviewed by the City Council. Mr. Root asked if a wood chip trail was acceptable. Mr. Bengston replied because this was not a required trail, the developer could propose any type of trail material he wanted. DRAFT MINUTES •