My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/27/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
09/27/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2014 1:27:00 PM
Creation date
6/20/2014 10:29:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/27/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />Village of Hardwood Creek <br />page 9 <br />To amend this statement raises the question of amending the growth projections, an <br />important part of planning the community's future. This will be extensively analyzed and <br />discussed as part of the overall review of the comprehensive plan that must be completed <br />by the end of year 2008. <br />• Therefore, we recommend no amendment to this statement in the comprehensive plan. <br />Conservation Development Issues <br />Stormwater management methods, open space areas, connecting habitat and trail <br />greenways are conservation development elements described in several policy <br />documents. The Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan provides <br />guidance. The draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) discusses such <br />elements and will include a number of them in its mitigation plan. As an incentive, the <br />growth management policy allows conservation development to be exempt from a <br />number of the growth restrictions. <br />The applicants originally intended the application to be a conservation development <br />project. They are aware of the City's desire to encourage conservation design, and have <br />been following the AUAR project. They also found the growth management incentives <br />attractive. However, the exemptions from growth limits do not include the Stage 1 <br />MUSA total, so a comp plan amendment would still be necessary. <br />In addition, we need a great deal of information to classify a project as a conservation <br />development in order to exempt it from the specified growth restrictions. Specific <br />information would include such things as stormwater management designs, open space <br />designs, long term stewardship plans for open space, etc. Such information typically <br />would be included in a planned unit development /plat application. The current <br />application for a comprehensive plan amendment does not include detailed information <br />that would support exempting a "conservation development" from specified growth . <br />management limits. <br />Even so, we support the developer's efforts to incorporate as many environmentally <br />friendly elements as possible as the development design proceeds. The open space, <br />innovative stormwater management methods and attention to the long term management <br />of these design features demonstrate good planning by the developer and are consistent <br />with the City's environmental planning goals. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.