10/12/2005 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 17 4. Final Plat for Village No. 4 Staff stated Hartford Development has submitted a final plat for Village No. 4, which encompasses Outlots A, and E of Village No. 3. The submitted plat depicts 7 lots and three outlots. Block 1 will consist of four lots. Lot 1 is intended for the apartment /retail building, and Lot 4 is intended for the hotel. Lot 2 and 3 (and Outlot A) are intended for future buildings. Block 2 will consist of three lots. Lot 1 is intended for the shared parking area, Lot 2 is intended for Betty's Pies, and Lot 3 is intended for a future user. Two outlots are included that will also be for future uses. The title commitment for the property and final plat has been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. Staff recommended continuing the Final Plat, Village No. 4 to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The Board continued Final Plat, Village No. 4 to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting. F. PUBLIC HEARING, for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Village of Hardwood Creek Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 10:42 p.m. Staff stated they have received an application from Village of Hardwood Creek, LLC, to amend the comprehensive plan. A public hearing is required for a comprehensive plan amendment. A comprehensive plan amendment requires a formal vote. The application also includes a general concept plan for a planned unit development. The concept plan review is informal and does not require a vote. The amendment to the comprehensive plan would involve a number of elements. The growth management policy, laid out in Ordinance No. 24 -04 was prepared to implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. The growth management policy requires that several issues be addressed if the City is to accommodate this application. This project application is the first one that requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan as directed by the growth management ordinance. Review of the relevant parts of the comprehensive plan resulted in recommendations to add or change several passages. This application does not include a planned unit development or preliminary plat. It does not include the detailed information normally part of such application. Because of this, staff cannot analyze the project to see if it would qualify for the exemptions to certain growth management limits as a conservation development. In addition, there are some limits from which staff cannot grant exemptions. Therefore, a comprehensive plan DRAFT MINUTES