Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 14, 2005 <br />Page 18 <br />amendment is needed to address growth issues as well as changing the land use <br />designation for the site. <br />Staff anticipates this application will require additional consideration beyond this <br />meeting, so a special meeting of the P &Z has been arranged for September 27 for further <br />discussion. <br />Staff reviewed their analysis and recommended the Board open the public hearing, take <br />comments, and continue the public hearing to the special meeting on September 27. <br />Mr. Laden asked what was the City gaining by allowing this. Mr. Smyser replied on <br />page 7 of his report addressed this item. <br />Mr. Laden stated he was concerned that the language of the text stated it "may include, <br />but not limited to ". He asked if this was opening the door too wide. Mr. Smyser <br />responded that was a good point and the language might need to be revised. <br />Mr. Nelson believed the intent was to leave it somewhat open and leave it to the City's <br />discretion and he believed they met the criteria. <br />Mr. Laden stated he was not arguing that this project did not meet the criteria, but he was <br />concerned how this might affect other potential developments as well. <br />Mr. Laden stated he was in favor of what he saw and amending the Comprehensive Plan <br />and moving forward with this. He noted he would not be in attendance at the September <br />27 Special Meeting. <br />Chair Rafferty stated he would like to hear from the audience members and indicated due <br />to the lateness of the hour, he would like to continue staff's comments to the special <br />meeting. <br />Chair Rafferty invited the public to make comment. <br />Greg Hayes, developer, showed the Board what was changing in the zoning. He asked <br />the Board if they had any questions. He noted they would come back to the Board with <br />the specific site details in the future. He indicated the Board would see a lot more <br />modifications and changes as time progresses. <br />Mr. Nelson asked if they owned the land to the south of the development. Mr. Hayes <br />replied they did not own the land, but they had permission to put in the road and this fit <br />road fit into Centerville's long -range plans. <br />Chair Rafferty stated in the commercial parkway area it talked about a roadway as being <br />24 feet. He asked what the typical parkway type roadway was. He asked if this fell in <br />line with City standards. Mr. Smyser responded how these streets would be laid out <br />would be examined as part of the PUD and plat application, which they were not looking <br />at yet. He indicated they would have to see what happened and the developer was simply <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />