My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/12/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
10/12/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2014 1:25:38 PM
Creation date
6/20/2014 10:34:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
10/12/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Legacy Hotel, page 5 <br />•The submitted plans meet all of the landscaping requirements of Chapter 3.6. <br />The site plan indicates a total of 81 parking spaces within the surface parking lot. This means that the 13 trees <br />provided throughout the lot exceeds the requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot <br />abuts Interstate 35W, therefore plantings must occur that `screen' the metal security fence. The proposed <br />landscape plan does depict deciduous trees spaced 60 feet on center, accentuated with coniferous trees; however <br />staff is adding a condition that a minimum of four shrubs be added per tree to this landscape planter to provide <br />adequate screening. The shrubs shown on the planting pallet should be used, and should be spread evenly <br />throughout the planter area. The 81 total surface parking spaces provided in this lot does not meet or exceed the <br />threshold of 300 spaces which would require the implementation of connecting walkways throughout the <br />parking lot. <br />All of the landscaping materials proposed as a part of the planting palette for the site satisfy the comments of <br />the Environmental Board as well as city staff. <br />Lighting <br />The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of <br />*Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The parking lot fixtures do not meet city standards and are being conditioned to <br />be replaced by shoebox fixtures. The parking lot lighting that will be used for this phase of development must <br />be repeated throughout this block, if not throughout the entire Legacy at Woods Edge project area. It is also <br />recommended that the Domus luminaire located near the south entrance drive be moved further west to better <br />Aikilluminate the drive. A revised lighting plan indicating conformance with these recommendations must be <br />VI/submitted. <br />The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building. <br />These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment. <br />Engineering <br />The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorandum <br />including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed through the <br />site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction. <br />Final Plat <br />The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached to the same agenda as a separate item, and a condition <br />will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved prior to City Council approval for this building. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD <br />The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31St regular meeting. Their comments are <br />attached and are addressed in the landscaping portion of this report. <br />40OPTIONS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.