My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/08/2006 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2006
>
03/08/2006 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2014 12:32:15 PM
Creation date
6/20/2014 2:22:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/08/2006
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Pheasant Stroll Estates <br />page 3 <br />The applicants propose a temporary private access to CR J which then would be removed <br />in the future when the new public street is built. The private drive would connect to the <br />new public street near the northwest corner of the site. <br />Two problems arise with the proposal. First, it would be difficult to get the "temporary" <br />access removed and connect with the new public street. Residents of the townhome <br />neighborhood likely would oppose removing an existing driveway access and connecting <br />to a public street. Once an access exists, and the entire neighborhood is built and <br />populated while that access exists, it is very difficult to remove it. In addition, we have <br />experienced many occasions where residents oppose a new connection to an abutting <br />development after they are accustomed to isolation. <br />The second problem is that the proposed design puts all of a new street entirely on <br />another property. This would mean that the property owner to the west would bear the <br />entire loss of land to the road. It is typical to align roads on property lines, with half the <br />right of way dedicated from development on each side. <br />It is possible that the site could access directly onto Ware Road. However, the questions <br />of connecting to a future public road on the west side, and right of way for this road, are <br />not completely addressed by this option. <br />The proposal does include additional right of way dedication for CR J. It also includes <br />land for the future realignment of Ware Rd. The goal there is for the City to be able to <br />align Ware Rd. with the existing Mackubin St. in Shoreview to create a four -way <br />intersection rather than the existing off set situation. <br />The proposed design does not take into account the larger public interests in access <br />management. Staff does not support the proposed design. <br />Utilities: Municipal utilities comprise the other vital infrastructure element in the <br />49/J planning study. Water must be looped through the area. Water trunk lines terminate <br />in the southern ends of Ware Rd. on the east side and Woodridge Lane on the west. Long <br />water trunks without looping may not provide adequate pressure. <br />The proposed design of Pheasant Stroll Estates includes a utility corridor connecting to <br />the water and sanitary sewer trunks existing in Ware Road. We do not yet know if the <br />water service is adequate to support this development. A test is scheduled by the Public <br />Works Dept. <br />A sanitary sewer trunk also exists in Ware Road. However, it is very shallow. The 49/J <br />study has taught us that a lift station likely will be needed for the area. Whether this will <br />flow to Ware Road or north to another connection point needs to be determined. <br />Stormwater Management, Wetlands: The north east portion of the site includes <br />1.8 acres of a larger wetland complex that extends across properties to the north. A <br />mitigation plan will be needed if wetlands are filled. The square buffer easement shown <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.