05/10/2006 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 2 A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a commercial dog kennel at 7933 -24th Avenue Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval subject to the five conditions listed in the staff report. Chair Rafferty declared the continued Public Hearing open at 6:38 p.m. Board members expressed concern for current unsanitary conditions of the site along with runs that do not meet standards. Board members agreed that at this time, the site is not compliant with the regulations for a kennel license. City Staff reminded the board that they are voting on a conditional use permit for the property, not a kennel license. Mr. Bengtson reported that the police department will inspect the site for compliance with the ordinance in regards to a kennel license. Mr. Bengtson confirmed that the city could revoke the conditional use permit if a violation of Section 502 of the City Code occurs. Board members were concerned with the issuance of a commercial use versus a private use, noting that a commercial use is intended for the sale of dogs. Mr. Bengtson noted that the standards for a private or commercial kennel are the same, but a maximum of four dogs are allowed with a private kennel. Board members agreed that the animal ordinance should be revised, stating that it lacks standards that should be in place for the protection of dogs. Mr. Bengtson clarified that the applicant has submitted a separate application for a commercial kennel license and that the Police Department would have to inspect the site for licensing. Mr. Rafferty invited the public to speak. No one was present to speak on the subject. The applicant was not present. Mr. Tralle made a motion to close the Public Hearing at 7:13 p.m. and was supported by Nelson. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Rafferty pointed out a discrepancy regarding the number of allowable dogs referred to in the applicant's letter. Mr. Bengtson stated that he could clarify the number being requested with the applicant. He added that he understands the applicant is trying to comply in order to keep all of her dogs, and a private kennel allows a maximum of four dogs. Mr. Bengtson stated that according to the applicant, the sixth dog mentioned in the letter belonged to a relative. • Mr. Pogalz pointed out that a commercial kennel would allow for a dog to have puppies, but they must be gone by six months of age. DRAFT MINUTES